Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Balasubramanian vs Shanthi Hosiery on 8 July, 2021

Author: R.Subramanian

Bench: R.Subramanian

                                                                   C.S.No.715 of 1998

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             DATED : 08.07.2021

                                                   CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

                                              C.S.No.715 of 1998

                     R.Balasubramanian                                ...Plaintiff

                                                        .Vs.


                     1.Shanthi Hosiery,
                       14, Nithyadhan Mukerjee Road,
                       Howrah – 711 101.

                     2.Sankaar,

                     3.My Choice,
                       14, Nityadhan Mukherjee Road,
                       (5th Floor), Samabaika Hat,
                       Howrah – 711 101.

                     4.R.R.Roy

                     5.R.K.Traders,
                       14, Nityadhan Mukherjee Road,
                       (5th Floor), Howrah - 711 101.

                     6.Ashok Kumar Daga,
                       14, Nityadhan Mukherjee Road,
                       (5th Floor), Howrah - 711 101.


                     Page No.1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                              C.S.No.715 of 1998

                     7.Sunita Hosiery,
                       13, Nityadhan Mukherjee Road,
                       (4th Floor), Howrah - 711 101.

                     8.S.R.S.Biswajit Saha

                     9.Prodip Chandraroy Nihar Ranjan Roy

                     10.S.R.S. & Sons,
                       14, Nityadhan Mukherjee Road,
                       Samabiyaka Hat (4th Floor)
                       Howrah – 711 101.
                     11.K.C.Jain
                     12.Balaji
                     13.D.Banik                                           ... Defendants


                               Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code and
                     under Sections 105 and 106 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act,
                     1958 and Sections 55 and 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957 praying for a
                     judgment and decree :
                               a) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants
                     themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them
                     from in any manner infringing the plaintiff's well established trade mark
                     M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS by suing the offending trade
                     mark M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS or any other mark or
                     marks which are deceptively similar to or a colourable imitation of the
                     plaintiff's well established trade mark M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN
                     CASUALS;


                     Page No.2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                  C.S.No.715 of 1998

                               b) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants by
                     themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them
                     from in any manner infringing the plaintiff's copyright over the aritstic
                     work M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS by using the offending
                     artistic work “M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS” or any other
                     work or works which are deceptively similar to or a colourable imitation
                     of the plaintiff's copyright over the artistic work         M-K-M GARRY
                     AMERICAN CASUALS;
                               c) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants
                     themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them
                     from in any manner passing off of their hosiery products including
                     T.Shirts bearing the offending trade mark and artistic work M-K-M
                     GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS as and for the plaintiffs' hosiery
                     products including T.shirts bearing the well established trade mark and
                     copyright over the artistic work            M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN
                     CASUALS, either by selling or offering for sale or in any manner
                     advertising the same;
                               d) directing the defendants to render true and faithful accounts of
                     the profits earned by them by using the offending trade mark and artistic
                     work          M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS and directing the
                     payment of such profits to the plaintiffs by way of damages and
                               e) directing the defendants to surrender to the plaintiffs the entire
                     stock of unused hosiery products including T.shirts bearing the offending
                     “M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS” trade mark label together


                     Page No.3/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                  C.S.No.715 of 1998

                     with the blocks and dyes for destruction and
                               f) for costs of the suit.
                                      For Plaintiff        : No appearance

                                      For Defendant        : No appearance

                                                         ********
                                                     JUDGMENT

The suit has been filed by the plaintiff for a decree and judgment:

a) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them from in any manner infringing the plaintiff's well established trade mark M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS by suing the offending trade mark M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS or any other mark or marks which are deceptively similar to or a colourable imitation of the plaintiff's well established trade mark M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS;
b) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants by themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them from in any manner infringing the plaintiff's copyright over the aritstic work M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS by using the offending artistic work “M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS” or any other Page No.4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.715 of 1998 work or works which are deceptively similar to or a colourable imitation of the plaintiff's copyright over the artistic work M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS;
c) granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants themselves, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them from in any manner passing off of their hosiery products including T.Shirts bearing the offending trade mark and artistic work M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS as and for the plaintiffs' hosiery products including T.shirts bearing the well established trade mark and copyright over the artistic work M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS, either by selling or offering for sale or in any manner advertising the same;
d) directing the defendants to render true and faithful accounts of the profits earned by them by using the offending trade mark and artistic work M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS and directing the payment of such profits to the plaintiffs by way of damages and
e) directing the defendants to surrender to the plaintiffs the entire Page No.5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.715 of 1998 stock of unused hosiery products including T.shirts bearing the offending “M-K-M GARRY AMERICAN CASUALS” trade mark label together with the blocks and dyes for destruction and
f) for costs of the suit.

2. Since the lead counsel for the plaintiff is no more and the other counsel was serving the on the bench of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board, I had by order dated 28.04.2021 directed notice to be issued to the plaintiff. Accordingly a notice is issued and the same was served on the plaintiff on 05.06.2021. Despite such service the plaintiff has not chosen to enter appearance to prosecute the suit.

3. The suit is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.




                                                                                       08.07.2021
                     dsa
                     Index      : No
                     Internet   : Yes
                     Non-Speaking order

List of the witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiff: Nil Page No.6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.715 of 1998 List of Exhibits marked on the side of the plaintiff : Nil List of the witnesses examined on the side of the defendants: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the defendants: Nil 08.07.2021 dsa Page No.7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.715 of 1998 R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

dsa C.S.No.715 of 1998 08.07.2021 Page No.8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/