Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M.Mohandoss vs (1) The Union Of India on 30 November, 2022

Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

                                                                    Arb.O.P.(Comm.Div.) No.636 of 2022

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 30.11.2022

                                                     CORAM

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

                                        Arb.O.P.(Comm.Div.) No.636 of 2022
                                                      and
                                                A.No.5192 of 2022

                     M.Mohandoss                                             ... Petitioner

                                                        vs.

                     (1) The Union of India
                         Represented by the General Manager,
                         Southern Railway, Park Town,
                         Chennai-600 003.

                     (2) The Chief Engineer/Construction/Central
                         Construction Office,
                         Southern Railway,
                         Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

                     (3) The Deputy Chief Engineer/II
                         Guage Conversion, Southern Railway,
                         State Bank Road, Opp. to Hotel Arun
                         Tiruchitrapalli-620 001.

                     (4) Shri.K.Krishna Murthy, (Presiding Arbitrator)
                         Retd. PCMM/SR
                         Flat No.304, 8-2-468/A/2,
                         Shipla Park View Apartments,
                         Raod No.5, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500 034.

                     1/4


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                      Arb.O.P.(Comm.Div.) No.636 of 2022

                     (5) Shri.S.Ramasubbu (Co-Arbitrator)
                         Retd PCEE/SR
                         G1 Ganga Flats, 16/39,
                         Noor Veerasamy Street,
                         Nungambakkam,
                         Chennai-600 034.

                     (6) Shri. K.Rama Subramonia Pillai, (Co-Arbitrator)
                         Retd FA & CAO/SR
                         Flat G4, Morning Rose, Victoria Garden,
                         No.1, IAF Station Road,
                         Tambaram East,
                         Chennai.                                                ... Respondents
                     PRAYER: Arbitration Original Petition filed under Sections 14 and 15 of
                     the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, pleased to (A) Terminate the
                     mandate of the present Arbitral Tribunal (Comprising of the 4th, 5th and 6th
                     Respondents) and appoint an Independent Arbitrator to arbitrate all the
                     disputes      and      claims   arising    out     of      the       Agreement
                     No.109/HQ/Dy.CE/GC/II/TPJ dated 31.03.2011 to Arbitration; (B) Direct
                     the 1st respondent to issue revised terms of reference in terms of the
                     petitioners request dated 19.10.2022; and (C) Direct the Respondent to pay
                     the cost of the Petition.
                                  For Petitioner     : Mr.G.Jermiah

                                  For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Ramkumar,
                                                    Standing Counsel (Railways) for R1 to R3
                                                        **********




                     2/4


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                            Arb.O.P.(Comm.Div.) No.636 of 2022

                                                            ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed to withdraw the petition. He has made an endorsement for the said purpose.

2. Recording the same, Arb.O.P.(Com. Div.) No.636 of 2022 is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected application is closed.

There will be no order as to costs.




                                                                                               30.11.2022

                     Index          : Yes / No

                     Internet : Yes / No

                     kal




                     3/4


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.O.P.(Comm.Div.) No.636 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J kal Arb.O.P.(Comm.Div.) No.636 of 2022 and A.No.5192 of 2022 30.11.2022 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis