Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Axis Bank Limited vs Subhranil Banerjee on 3 March, 2020

Author: Ashis Kumar Chakraborty

Bench: Ashis Kumar Chakraborty

O-20                           ORDER SHEET
                              A.P. No. 77 OF 2020

                         IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                     Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
                                 ORIGINAL SIDE


                               AXIS BANK LIMITED

                                    Versus

                              SUBHRANIL BANERJEE


   BEFORE:

   The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASHIS KUMAR CHAKRABORTY

   Date : 3rd March, 2020.

                                                       Appearance:
                                                 Mr. Sayan Ganguly, Adv.
                                                 Mr. Joydeep Roy, Adv.
                                                 Mr. Arijit Dey, Adv.
                                                       ... for petitioner.



       The Court : This is an application under Section 9 of the

Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended by Act 3 of 2016.

       From the affidavit of service filed by the petitioner it

appears that the petitioner forwarded copies of the application to

the respondent and the respondent has received the same.

The petitioner claims that in terms of an agreement dated May 22, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as "the said agreement") the respondent obtained financial accommodation to acquire the asset mentioned in paragraph 2 of the application which remains hypothecated to the petitioner. According to the petitioner, the respondent has failed to pay the monthly instalments and as such as on February 4, 2020 Rs.14,16,262/- became due and owing by the 2 respondent to the petitioner. In spite of demands the respondent has failed to pay the said outstanding dues. Thus, the petitioner has terminated the said agreement and filed this application for taking possession of the hypothecated asset through a Receiver.

Considering the materials on record, I find that the petitioner substantiated a case for appointment of a Receiver.

Accordingly, Ms. Jharna Biswas, Advocate of Ladies Bar Association(Room No. 18) is appointed as the Receiver to take possession of the hypothecated asset mentioned in paragraph 2 of the application presently lying at Eden City, Mukundapur.

The petitioner shall pay an initial remuneration of 2000 Gms. to the Receiver and shall also bear the travelling expenses of the Receiver for her visit to the relevant place in the state of West Bengal.

Needless to mention that a competent officer of the petitioner shall all along accompany the Receiver in the state of West Bengal.

If necessary, the Receiver shall approach the Officer-in- charge of the concerned police station for obtaining police assistance to implement this order. If the petitioner deposits the requisite fees with the concerned authorities, the Officer-in- charge of the concerned police station shall render necessary police assistance to the Receiver to take actual physical possession of the hypothecated asset from the respondents. 3

The matter is made returnable on March 17, 2020. The Receiver shall file his report on the next date of hearing.

All parties, including the Receiver and the concerned police authorities shall act on the copy of the certified website copy of this order.

(ASHIS KUMAR CHAKRABORTY, J.) mg