Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

N.C.Sunil vs The District Collector on 23 February, 2016

Author: P.B. Suresh Kumar

Bench: P.B.Suresh Kumar

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT:

            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

        FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/14TH SRAVANA, 1938

                    WP(C).No. 26084 of 2016 (I)
                    ----------------------------


PETITIONER(S):
-------------

          1. N.C.SUNIL,
            AGED 50 YEARS, S/O CHANDRAN,
            NELLISSERI HOUSE, KURICHIKKARA (PO),
            THRISSUR DISTRICT-680028.

          2. JOY JACOB,
            S/O CHACKO, INCHAKUZHIPARAYIL,
            KUNDUKAD PO, MUTTICKAL,
            THRISSUR DISTRICT.

          3. M.B.CHANDRASEKHARAN,
            MANGATTUNJALIL HOUSE,
            KURICHIKKARA (PO),
            THRISSUR DISTRICT-680028.


            BY ADVS.SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN
                    SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

          1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
            CIVIL STATION, THRISSUR-680001.

          2. THE ADDTIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,
            THRISSUR-680012.


            BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA


       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
       05-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
       FOLLOWING:


PJ

WP(C).No. 26084 of 2016 (I)
----------------------------

                             APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------

EXHIBIT P1       TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCES IN FORM LE 3 AS PER
                 ARTICLE 3(A) TO (D) PART 1 OF SCHEDULE IV OF THE
                 EXPLOSIVES RULES 2008 TO THE 1ST PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P2       TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCES IN FORM LE 3 AS PER
                 ARTICLE 3(A) TO (D) OF PART 1 OF SCHEDULE IV OF THE
                 EXPLOSIVES RULES 2008 TO THE 2ND PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P3       TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCES IN FORM LE 3 AS PER
                 ARTICLE 3(A) TO (D) OF PART OF SCHEDULE IV OF THE
                 EXPLOSIVES RULES 2008 TO THE 3RD PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P4       TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR NENEWAL OF LICENCE
                 WITH RECEIPT DATED 23.2.2016.

EXHIBIT P5       TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE
                 WITH RECEIPT DATED 4.3.2016.

EXHIBIT P6       TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE
                 WITH RECEIPT DATED 23.2.2016.

EXHIBIT P7       TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING OF THE DISTRICT
                 COLLECTOR MALAPPURAM NO.K.DIS.E7/66650/14 DATED
                 9.2.2016.

EXHIBIT P8       TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE CONTROLLER OF
                 EXPLOSIVES DATED 7.6.2013 IN FAVOUR OF ONE
                 SIVASANKARAN M.P.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------

                 NIL.

                                              / TRUE COPY /


                                              P.S. TO JUDGE
PJ



                P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.

         -------------------------------------------------

               W.P.(C) No. 26084 of 2016

         -------------------------------------------------

         Dated this the 5th day of August, 2016


                         JUDGMENT

The limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, when this matter was taken up for admission, is for a direction to the respondents to consider Exts.P4 to P6 applications preferred by the petitioners for renewal of Exts.P1 to P3 licences issued under the Explosives Rules, 2008.

2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to direct the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P4 to P6 applications within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording the petitioners an opportunity for hearing. The petitioners are free to produce a copy of this judgment for compliance before the W.P.(C) No. 26084 of 2016 -2- first respondent.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

P.B. SURESH KUMAR JUDGE bpr