Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

National Green Tribunal

Dcm Shriram Limited vs National Biodiversity Authority on 1 April, 2022

Bench: K Ramakrishnan, K. Satyagopal

Item No.20 to 22:-

              BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL
                   SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI

                          (Through Video Conference)

                         Appeal No. 61 of 2021 (SZ)
                                  With
                         Appeal No. 62 of 2021 (SZ)
                                  With
                         Appeal No. 63 of 2021 (SZ)

IN THE MATTER OF


      DCM Shriram Limited, New Delhi
                                                            ...Appellant (s)

                                   Versus

      The National Biodiversity Authority,
      Rep. by its Member Secretary,
      Chennai.
                                                           ....Respondent(s)

Date of hearing: 01.04.2022.


CORAM:

      HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER

      HON'BLE Dr. SATYAGOPAL KORLAPATI, EXPERT MEMBER


For Appellant(s):              Mr. Aravindhaswamy represented
                               Mr. T. Sai Krishnan and
                               Mr. Adarsh Ramanujan.


For Respondent(s):             Mr. Shankar Vignesh represented
                               Mr. M.R. Gokul Krishnan for R1.




                                  Page 1 of 2
                                    ORDER

1. The above cases have been posted to today for hearing.

2. Mr. Aravindhaswamy who represented the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that they have engaged Mr. Adarsh Ramanujan who proposed to appear along with Mr. T. Sai Krishnan and he wanted some time to argue the matter.

3. Mr. Shankar Vignesh who represented Mr. M.R. Gokul Krishnan, the learned counsel appearing for the 4th Respondent also wanted some more time to argue the matter.

4. The common question involved in these cases is whether the activity of the appellant attracts the provisions of the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 or not.

5. Considering the new engagement of counsel by the appellant, we feel that some accommodation can be granted to them and parties are directed to get ready with the matter on 19.04.2022 for hearing.

6. For hearing, post on 19.04.2022.

Sd/-

Justice K. Ramakrishnan, JM Sd/-

Dr. Satyagopal Korlapati, EM Appeal No.61/2021 (SZ) Appeal No.62/2021 (SZ) Appeal No.63/2021 (SZ), 01st April 2022. Mn.

Page 2 of 2