Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Shri. Patil Shashikant Parmeshwar vs The District Vocational Education And ... on 31 August, 2021

Author: G. S. Kulkarni

Bench: G. S. Kulkarni

                                                   986-WP.9373.2013+3

Pdp


         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                CIVIL APPELLATE JURISIDICTION

                  WRIT PETITION NO. 9373 of 2013

      Shri.Mudhe Balasaheb Daji            }     Petitioner
                Versus
      State of Maharashtra and Ors.        }     Respondents

                            WITH
                WRIT PETITION NO. 8266 OF 2013
                            WITH
             INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4155 OF 2019

      Shri.Patil Shashikant Parmeshwar}          Petitioner
                 Versus
      The District Vocational Education }
      and Training Officer and Ors.     }        Respondents

                             WITH
                 WRIT PETITION NO. 9377 OF 2013

      Shri. Thorat Harishchandra           }
      Shankar                              }     Petitioner
                Versus
      State of Maharashtra and Ors.        }     Respondents


      Mr.I.M.Khairdi for the petitioner in WP/8266/2013 and fofr the
      applicant in IA/4155/2019.

      Mr.M.V.Thorat for respondent nos. 5 and 6 in WP/9377/2013.

      Ms.N.M.Mehra-AGP for State.


                      C0RAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ &
                              G. S. KULKARNI, J.
                      DATE       : AUGUST 31, 2021


                             1
                                                                      986-WP.9373.2013+3




                      PC :

1. These petitions have been notified as per the list of matters as received from the office of the learned Government Pleader to have become infructuous. As per the office notice dated 27th August 2021, the Advocate for the petitioner/petitioners was called upon to give a praecipe in advance in case the petition has not become infructuous. Such praecipe has not been received in regard to these petitions. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of as infructuous; however, with liberty to the petitioners to revive the petitions in case something survives.

2. Disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

3. Interim Application does not survive and stands disposed of.

(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Digitally signed by PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2021.09.06 14:05:30 +0530 2