Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

State Of Kerala vs P.M.Vijaya Raghavan on 11 November, 2011

Author: K.Surendra Mohan

Bench: K.Surendra Mohan

       

  

  

 
 
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT:

              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN

         FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2012/10TH CHAITHRA 1934

               RP.No. 240 of 2012 ()  IN WPC/14542/2008
                ----------------------------------------
        AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.14542/2008 DATED 11-11-2011

REVIEW PETITIONER/2ND RESPONDENT:-
--------------------------------

         STATE OF KERALA
         REP.BY ITS SECRETARY
         FISHERIES AND PORTS(A)DEPARTMENTGOVERNMENT
         SECRETARIAT
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

         BY ADV. GOVT.PLEADER

RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONERS & 1ST RESPONDENT:-
------------------------------------------

     1.  P.M.VIJAYA RAGHAVAN
         JUNIOR EXECUTIVE , REGIONAL OFFICER
         KERALA FISHERMEN'S WELFARE FUND BOARD, KOZHIKODE

     2.  O.B.THANKAMANI
         PEON, REGIONAL OFFICER
         KERALA FRISHERMEN'S WELFARE FUND BOARD, ERNAKULAM

     3.  KERALA FISHERMEN'S WELFARE FUND BOARD,
         AYYAPPA NAGAR, POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR -2
         REP.BY ITS FHIERIES WELFARE COMMISSIONER.

         BY  SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA
         BY  SRI.ASOK M.CHARIYAN, SC, KFWFB

       THIS REVIEW PETITION  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION  ON
     30-03-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:



                 K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.

                  = = = = = = = = = = = =
                      R.P.No.240 of 2012
                              in
                  WP(C).No.14542 of 2008.
                  = = = = = = = = = = = =

               Dated this the 30th March, 2012.

                        O R D E R

This Review petition has been filed by the State seeking correction of the judgment dated 11.11.2011. In the first paragraph of the said judgment, it has been stated that the petitioners are permitted to continue in service till they attain the age of 58 years as per the interim order granted by the Division Bench in WA.No.1054/2008 on 27.5.2008. According to the review petitioner, the petitioners were allowed to continue in service on the basis of the judgment of the Division Bench dated 27.5.2008 in WA.No.1054/2008. The counsel for the petitioner also submits that the above is a mistake that requires correction as sought for in this Review Petition. R.P.No.240/2012 in WP(C).No.14542/2008.

2

For the above reason, this Review Petition is allowed. The judgment is corrected accordingly.

K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge) Kvs/-