Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S. Winstar Marketing India vs The Chief Commissioner Of on 17 August, 2015

Author: R.Mahadevan

Bench: R.Mahadevan

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED   17.8.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.No.24013/2015 and
M.P.No.1 of 2015

   M/s. Winstar Marketing India               
   Private Limited  No.30 31  Sundar Nagar  
   Alapakkam Main Road  Alapakkam  Chennai-116  
   Rep. by its Managing Director Shri. T.J.
   Jezreel Hussain			... 	             Petitioner
Vs

1    The Chief Commissioner of                    
     Customs  Custom House  No.60  Rajaji Salai  
     Chennai-600 001.

2    Commissioner of Customs 
     Group-6  Chennai II  Commissionerate  Custom 
     House  No.60  Rajaji Salai  Chennai-600 001.

3    The Joint Commissioner
     Of Customs  (Group 6)  Chennai II 
     Commissionerate  Custom House  No.60  Rajaji 
     Salai  Chennai-600 001.

4    The Deputy Commissioner of
     Customs (Group 6)  Chennai II 
     Commissionerate  Custom House  No.60  Rajaji 
     Salai  Chennai-600 001.	         ...	                          Respondents


Prayer:-  Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to assess and clear the imported goods viz. viz. Furnitures  covered under Bill of Entry No.9868109 dated 13.07.2015  in terms of section 110A of Custom Act  1962 read with Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment Regulations) 2011.
	
	For Petitioner	 :Mr.B.Satish Sundar
	For Respondents    :Mr.V.Sundareswaran, 
			senior standing counsel
	
			  
			  ORDER

The writ petition is filed for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to assess and clear the imported goods viz. viz. Furnitures covered under Bill of Entry No.9868109 dated 13.07.2015 in terms of section 110A of Custom Act 1962 read with Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment Regulations) 2011.

2. The petitioner entity imported furniture from Malaysia vide invoice No.105056 and Bill of Entry No.9868109. The clearing agents of the petitioner entity was informed by the officers attached to the fourth respondent that the value declared by them in respect of the subject goods was not acceptable to them for the purposes of assessment and that the value will be enhanced. The petitioners had informed that they were willing to pay the duty as demanded from them under protest vide communication dated 10.07.2015 followed by a reminder dated 27.07.2015. However, the goods were directed to be assessed on first appraisement basis and no decision was taken in respect of their request of payment of duty under protest. Under the circumstances, the fourth respondent was requested to issue a 'Speaking Order' within 15 days in terms of Section 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962 for non acceptance of the declared values and was informed of the mounting demurrage and container detention charges. Copy of the said communication was also made to the office of the 1st to 3rd respondents. Since there is no positive response to the said communications and demand of the petitioner entity, the present writ petition has been filed for the relief as stated above.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned senior standing counsel for the respondents. The necessary documents have also been perused.

4. Provisional release in terms of Section 110 A of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations 2011 could have been made, followed by further proceedings. Hence, the detained consignment shall be released on payment of Rs.2,59,688/- being 50% of the differential duty and for the remaining 50% of the differential duty, a bond be executed by the petitioner and on such compliance, the goods shall be released forthwith. The respondent is also directed to pass a speaking order which shall be served on the petitioner and it is open to the petitioner to testify the same in the manner known to law.

R.MAHADEVAN,J.

kua

5. The Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

17.8.2015 kua Note: Issue on 19.8.2015 To 1 The Chief Commissioner of Customs Custom House No.60 Rajaji Salai Chennai-600 001.

2 Commissioner of Customs Group-6 Chennai II Commissionerate Custom House No.60 Rajaji Salai Chennai-600 001.

3 The Joint Commissioner Of Customs (Group 6) Chennai II Commissionerate Custom House No.60 Rajaji Salai Chennai-600 001.

4 The Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Group 6) Chennai II Commissionerate Custom House No.60 Rajaji Salai Chennai-600 001.

W.P.No.24013/2015