Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

The Comptroller And Auditor General Of ... vs C Chandra Kumar on 29 October, 2025

Author: Michael Zothankhuma

Bench: Michael Zothankhuma

                                                                   Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010131712025




                                                            undefined

                        THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1988/2025

         THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
         DEEN DAYAL UPADHAYA MARG, NEW DELHI- 110 124



         VERSUS

         C CHANDRA KUMAR
         S/O LT. C. CHEILATHURAI, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 2-71/A,
         THATTANVILAI, PO NORTH SOORANKUDY, DIST KANYAKUMARI, TAMIL
         NADU, 629501

         2:THE UNION OF INDIA
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
          MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY
         TRANSPORT BHAWAN
          NO. 1
          PARLIAMENT STREET
          NEW DELHI-110001.

         3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER ROADS
          SEEMA SADAK BHAWAN RING ROAD DELHI CANTT
          NEW DELHI-110010

         4:SECRETARY
          BORDER ROADS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
          B WING 4TH FLOOR
          SENA BHAWAN
          NEW DELHI- 110011

         5:SECRETARY

          DOPT
          NORTH BLOCK
                                                                Page No.# 2/4

             PMO NEW DELHI-110001

            6:THE CHAIRMAN
             UPSC
             DHOLPUR HOUSE
             SHAJAHAN ROAD
             NEW DELHI- 110069

            7:THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA (CANDAG
             DEEN DAYAL UPATHYAY MARG
             NEW DELHI- 110124.

            8:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
             PROJECT UDAYAK (GREF)
             CE (P) UDAYAK
             C/O- 99 APO
             PIN931715.

            9:THE COMMANDAR
             48 BRTF (GREF)
             C/O99 APO
             PIN- 930048

            10:THE OFFICER COMMANDING
             1444 BCC (GREF)
             C/O 99 AP

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. R K TALUKDAR,

Advocate for the Respondent : MR. I H SAIKIA,




             Linked Case : Review.Pet./4/2025

            C CHANDRA KUMAR
            S/O LT. C. CHEILATHURAI
            RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 2-71/A
            THATTANVILAI
            PO NORTH SOORANKUDY
            DIST KANYAKUMARI
            TAMIL NADU
            629501
                                                                  Page No.# 3/4

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS
TRANSPORT BHAWAN NO. 1
PARLIAMENT STREET
NEW DELHI 110001

2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
BORDER ROADS SEEMA SADAK BHAWAN
 RING ROAD DELHI CANTT. NEW DELHI 110010

3:THE SECRETARY
BORDER ROADS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
B WING
4TH FLOOR
SENA BHAWAN
NEW DELHI 110011

4:THE SECRETARY
DOPT. NORTH BLOCK
PMO NEW DELHI 110001.

5:THE CHAIRMAN
UPSC DHOLPUR HOUSE SHAJAHAN ROAD NEW DELHI 110069

6:THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA ( C AND AG)
DEEN DAYAL UPADHAYAY MARG
NEW DELHI 110124

7:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PROJECT UDAYAK (GREF) CE (P) UPAYAK
C/O 99 APO
931715

 8:THE COMMANDANT
48 BRTF(GREF) C/O 99 APO
 930048

 9:THE OFFICER COMMANDING
1444 BCCC (GREF) C/O 99 APO
 931444
 ------------
Advocate for : MR. I H SAIKIA
Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS
                                                                          Page No.# 4/4


                                BEFORE
              HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

                                      ORDER

Date : 29/10/2025 Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, learned DSGI submits that the impugned judgement and order dated 18/02/2020 passed in WP(C) NO. 1537/2015, which is sought to be reviewed by filing Review Petition No. 4/2025, has been upheld by the Division Bench. Further, the judgement and order dated 18/02/2020 passed in WP(C) 1537/2015 has been applied while disposing of WP(C) No. 6603/2014, by order dated 23/11/2021. The said order dated 23/11/2021 passed in WP(C) 6603/2014 has been upheld by the Division Bench and the Supreme Court. As such, there does not seem to be any ground for review of the order passed in WP(C) 1537/2015.

Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, learned DSGI also submits that all the payments to be made in pursuant to the order passed in WP(C) 1537/2015 has already been paid on the basis of the order passed.

On the prayer of the learned counsel for the parties, list these matters on 18/11/2025.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant