Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Sharmila Raj Thackeray vs Kanchan Sunil Mansingani on 25 April, 2024

                                                         2

     ITEM NO.1726                                  COURT NO.17                  SECTION II-A

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Criminal Appeal                  No(s).     2074/2014

     SHARMILA RAJ THACKERAY                                                   Appellant(s)

                                                        VERSUS
     KANCHAN SUNIL MANSINGANI & ANR.                                          Respondent(s)

     Date : 25-04-2024 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                HON'BLE    MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE
                                                [IN CHAMBERS]
     For Appellant(s)

     For Respondent(s)                   Dr. Ravindra Chingale, Adv.
                                         Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv.
                                         Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR
                                         Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv.
                                         Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv.
                                         Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv.

                                 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

Office report shows that on account of elevation of the learned counsel representing the respondent No.1, notice was issued to the respondent no.1 for engagement of another counsel, the notice received back with postal remarks “left”.

The Respondent no.2 the State of Maharashtra is being represented by learned counsel, Mr. Ravindra Chingale.

In view of these factual aspects, it would be necessary to make certain arrangements for representation of the respondent No.1.

Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by SNEHA DAS Date: 2024.04.29 15:33:46 IST Reason: 2

Accordingly, the Secretary, Supreme Court Legal Services Committee is requested to take appropriate steps so that the respondent No.1 is represented by the counsel in the matter as and when the matter is listed before the Court.

     (GEETA JOSHI)                                            (NIDHI WASON)
SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT                                   COURT MASTER (NSH)