Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Shivkrupa Sahakari Patpedhi Ltd., ... vs 1.Shri Nanasaheb Kashinath Shinde, 2. ... on 10 January, 2014

  
 
 
 
 
 
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 
  







 



 
   
   
   

  
   


   
     
     
     

 BEFORE THE
    HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL   
    
   
    
     
     

 COMMISSION,
     MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI  
    
   
  
  
   

 
  
 
  
   
   

 
  
 
  
   
   
     
     
     
       
       
       
         
         
         

First
        Appeal No. A/09/1060
        
       
        
         
         

(Arisen
        out of Order Dated 10/08/2009 in Case No. 238/2009 of District Satara)
        
       
      
       

 
      
     
    
     

 
    
   
    
     
     

 
    
   
    
     
     
       
       
       

Shivkrupa Sahakari Patpedhi Ltd., Mumbai
       

Successor-in-Title of Dadasaheb Sakhvalkar 
       

Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. Eksal, through
       

1.

Chandrakant Shrirang Vanjari, Chairman

2. Bhimrao Digambar Borade, Vice-Chairman r/o. 1, Suryadarshan Tower, Nitin Company, Near Signal, Eastern Express Highway, Thane (west) 400 601.

3. Ramdas Vasant Karne r/a. Sadguru Chambers, Opp. Pushkar Mangal Karyalaya, Dist. Satara.

4. Dadasaheb Sakhavalkar Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd.

Eksal Shirbe, Koregaon, Dist.Satara through Chiarman Shri Bapuso Namdeo Bhosale r/o. Eksal, Post Shirbe, Koregaon, Dist.Satara.

5. Shri Maruti Baburao Mane, Vice-Chairman, r/o. Eksal, Post Shirbe, Koregaon, Dist.Satara.

...........Appellant(s) Versus  

1.Shri Nanasaheb Kashinath Shinde,

2. Mrs. Sushila Nanasaheb Shinde, Both r/o.13/2, Godoli Naka, Satara, Dist.Satara.

 

...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:

   
Hon'ble Mrs. Usha S. Thakare, Presiding Judicial Member   Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kawde Member PRESENT:
Adv.Mohit Bhansali for the appellant.
Adv.Dhanajay Rananaware for the respondents.
     
ORDER Per Honble Mrs.Usha S. Thakare, Presiding Judicial Member Appellant and Respondent in this Appeal No.1060/09 have arrived at consent terms before the Lok Adalat held on 10/01/2014 and have compromised the matter in presence of panel members. They have executed proforma/Consent Terms before the members of Lok Adalat. Consent terms shall be binding on both the parties and in case of default committed by either party, other party shall be at liberty to invoke the jurisdiction of this Commission to execute the said proforma/Consent Terms as if it is a decree passed by this Commission. Hence, the order:-
 
-:
ORDER :-
1.   Appeal No.1060/09 stands disposed of in terms of proforma/Consent Terms, which shall be attached herewith.
2.

Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.

 

Dated 10th January 2014 .

[Hon'ble Mrs. Usha S. Thakare] PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER       [Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kawde] MEMEBR