Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Nelson.J vs State Of Kerala on 6 March, 2018

Author: Sunil Thomas

Bench: Sunil Thomas

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                     PRESENT:

                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS

             TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1940

                               Crl.MC.No. 1979 of 2018

            AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 306/2011 of J.M.F.C.-II, KOLLAM
               CRIME NO. 141/2011 OF ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION , KOLLAM

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO 5:

1   NELSON.J.,
    S/O. JOHN JACOB, AGED 44 YEARS, ANCHITHA HOUSE,
    LAKSHMIPURAM THOPPE, MAYYANADU CHERRY, MAYYANADU
    VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

2   REENA,
    D/O. FRANCEENA, AGED 48 YEARS, ANCHITHA HOUSE,
    LAKSHMIPURAM THOPPE, MAYYANADU CHERRY, MAYYANADU
    VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

3   SINDHU,
    D/O. JOHN JACOB, AGED 40 YEARS, ADARSH BHAVAN, VARINJAM
    CHERRY, MEENADU VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

4   BINDU,
    D/O. JOHN JACOB, AGED 39 YEARS, ANUJA BHAVANAM, (VAYALIL
    VEEDU), PAVITHRAM NAGAR, THEKKUMBHAGAM CHERRY,
    ERAVIPURAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

5   MANJU,
    D/O. JOHN JACOB, AGED 36 YEARS, ANCHITHA HOUSE,
    LAKSHMIPURAM THOPPE, MAYYANADU VILLAGE, KOLLAM
    DISTRICT.

    BY ADVS.SRI.K.SIJU
        SMT.S.SEETHA


RESPONDENT(S)/STATE & DE FACTO COMPLAINANT :

1. STATE OF KERALA,
   THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERAVIPURAM POLICE
   STATION REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
   KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.

2. JAYA JOSEPH,
   D/O. MAGGI JOSEPH, AGED 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT JAYA COTTAGE,
  KAKKAKADAVU, AKKOLILCHERRY, MAYYANADU VILLAGE,
  KOLLAM DISTRICT-691303.

     R2 BY ADV. SRI.A.MUHAMMED RAFFI
     R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR:SRI AMJAD ALI

  THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-04-2018, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 1979 of 2018 ()




                                    APPENDIX




PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

ANNEXURE 1   THE COPY OF FIR WITH PRIVATE COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO. 141/2011 OF
ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION.

ANNEXURE 2           THE COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CRIME 141/2011 OF ERAVIPURAM
POLICE STATION.

ANNEXURE 3    THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT REGARDING THE
COMPROMISE DATED 6.03.2018.




RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL




                                                         True Copy / P A to Judge

                      SUNIL THOMAS, J.
                    =================
                  Crl.M.C.No.1979 of 2018
                    =================
               Dated this the 10th day of April, 2018

                             ORDER

Petitioners herein are arrayed as accused in Crime No.141 of 2011 of Eravipuram Police Station, now pending as C.C.No.306 of 2011 of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II Kollam, for offences punishable under sections 498A, 323 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The allegation of the second respondent herein, who is the defacto complainant is that, the first petitioner had married her on 15.05.2005 and thereafter, misappropriated her gold ornaments and money. It is also stated that the husband along with the in-laws who are the petitioner Nos.2 to 5 subjected her to extreme matrimonial cruelty. Ultimately, she laid the complaint and crime was registered. It was further contended that, matrimonial disputes were also pending in other courts. Crl.M.C is filed on a premise that pending the proceedings, the couple got divorced and now they are living separately. Since there is no existing matrimonial disputes between the parties, both parties have resolved to give quietus to the criminal proceeding. Accordingly, they have preferred this Crl.M.C. C rl.M.C.1979/18 2

3. Learned Public Prosecutor on instructions, submitted that the parties have resolved their dispute and statement of the defacto complainant has been recorded. Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the second respondent relied on Annexure-3 affidavit affirmed by the second respondent. It was submitted by the learned counsel that, she has no objection in quashing the proceedings. Evidently, dispute is one arising from a matrimonial dispute. Parties have resolved their dispute. Hence, no purpose will be served by prosecuting the petitioners herein. It is also to be considered that, such matters are liable to the quashed and legal proceedings brought to an end in the interest of justice.

In the result, Crl.M.C is allowed. All further proceedings arising from Crime No.141 of 2011 of Eravipuram Police Station now pending as C.C.No.306 of 2011 of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II Kollam will stand quashed.

Sd/-

SUNIL THOMAS Judge Sbna/10/4/18 True Copy / P A to Judge