Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Chief Engineer National Highways ... vs Mahakaleshwar Infratech Private ... on 10 February, 2025

Author: Vibhu Bakhru

Bench: Vibhu Bakhru, Anoop Kumar Mendiratta

                                    $~23
                                    *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                    +    FAO(OS) (COMM) 22/2025
                                         CHIEF ENGINEER NATIONAL
                                         HIGHWAYS DIVISION UPPWD                    .....Appellant
                                                      Through: Mr. Parivesh Singh, Mr. Prem
                                                                Parkash and Mr. Abhay Singh
                                                                Chauhan, Advocates.

                                                                                      versus

                                                MAHAKALESHWAR INFRATECH
                                                PRIVATE LIMITED                              .....Respondent
                                                              Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Advocate with
                                                                         Mr. Suvir Sharma, Ms. Tina Aneja,
                                                                         Ms. Anushka Nahar, Mr. Shiv Azad
                                                                         Sharma, Mr. Syed Meesam and
                                                                         Mr. Charchit Talwar, Advs.
                                                CORAM:
                                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
                                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
                                                              ORDER

% 10.02.2025 CM APPL. 7916/2025

1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 80 days in refiling the appeal is condoned.

2. The application stands disposed of.

FAO(OS) (COMM) 22/2025 & CM APPL. 7914-7915/2025

3. The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the A&C Act) impugning an order dated 06.09.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the learned Single Judge in O.M.P. (COMM) 382/2024, whereby the appellant's application under Section 34 of the A&C Act was rejected on the This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/02/2025 at 01:18:04 ground of delay.

4. The facts as noted in the impugned order are not in dispute. The appellant had assailed the arbitral award dated 17.10.2023 rendered in the context of the disputes that had arisen between the parties. Admittedly, the impugned award was received by the appellant on the same date, that is, on 17.10.2023. Thereafter, the respondent who is claimant before the learned arbitrator moved an application under Section 33 of the A&C Act, which was allowed by the learned arbitrator on 30.01.2024. This order (referred to as additional award in the impugned order) was also received by the appellant on the same date, that is, 30.01.2024.

5. The appellant had filed an application under Section 34(3) of the A&C Act for setting aside the impugned award on 07.08.2024. The appellant also moved an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the said application.

6. In terms of Section 34(3) of the A&C Act, the application to set aside an arbitral award may be moved within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the award, which in this case expired on 30.03.2024. The application was thus clearly beyond the period of limitation as prescribed under Section 34(3) of the A&C Act.

7. In terms of the proviso to Section 34(3) of the A&C Act, the court can condone a delay of 30 (thirty) days subject to the applicant satisfying the court that it was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the said application within the prescribed period of three months. The court has no jurisdiction to condone the delay beyond the period of thirty (30) days as specified in the proviso to Section 34(3) of the A&C Act. This issue is no longer res integra and is covered by the authoritative decision of the This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/02/2025 at 01:18:04 Supreme Court in Union of India vs Popular Construction Co.: (2001) 8 SCC 470.

8. The learned Single Judge has noted that the application filed beyond the period of thirty (30) days cannot be condoned by the court and accordingly dismissed the appellant's application to set aside the impugned arbitral award on the ground of limitation. We find no infirmity in the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge.

9. The appeal is unmerited and, accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications are also disposed of.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.

FEBRUARY 10, 2025 M Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/02/2025 at 01:18:05