Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Gujarat High Court

Yatin Jasubhai Patel & 4 vs State Of Gujarat & 8....Opponent(S) on 22 September, 2015

Author: Abhilasha Kumari

Bench: Abhilasha Kumari

                  C/MCA/2604/2015                                            ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

               MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR REVIEW) NO. 2604 of 2015

                   In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13958 of 2015

         ==========================================================
                        YATIN JASUBHAI PATEL & 40....Applicant(s)
                                        Versus
                         STATE OF GUJARAT & 8....Opponent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR NIKHIL S KARIEL, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 - 41
         ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GP/PP for the Opponent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

                  CORAM: HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA
                         KUMARI

                                    Date : 22/09/2015


                                      ORAL ORDER

1 Mr.   Nikhil   S   Kariel,   learned   advocate   for   the  petitioners,   has   moved   a   draft   amendment   dated  18.09.2015. The same is granted and may be carried out  during the course of the day.

2 This   application   has   been   preferred   by   the  applicant­original   petitioners   of   Special   Civil  Application No. 13958 of 2015, with a prayer to recall  the   order   dated   31.08.2015,   passed   in   the   said  petition and permit him to revive the said petition,  Page 1 of 4 HC-NIC Page 1 of 4 Created On Wed Sep 23 02:30:10 IST 2015 C/MCA/2604/2015 ORDER so that it can be heard on merits. 

3 The applicants had preferred the above mentioned  petition,   wherein,   this   Court   passed   the   following  order:

"The prayers made in the petition as well as the  statement   of   Mr.   Nikhil   S   Kariel,   learned   advocate for the petitioners, who has submitted   that there is an element of public interest in   the petition, reveal that the petition is in the  nature of a Public Interest Litigation.
Mr.   Nikhil   S  Kariel,  learned   advocate   for   the petitioners states that he may be permitted  to withdraw the petition, with a view to filing  a Public Interest Litigation.
Permission   to   withdraw   the   petition,   is   granted.
The petition is disposed of, as withdrawn."
 

4 Pursuant   thereto,   the   petitioners   preferred   a  Public Interest Litigation, being Writ Petition (PIL)  No.   186   of   2015,   wherein,   the  Division  Bench  passed  the following order:

"1 Mr. Nikhil S Kariel, learned Counsel for the  petitioners,   after   some   arguments,   seeks   permission   to   withdraw   the   present   petition,   since it is personal interest of the petitioners  in   capacity   as   aspirant   students   opting   for   admission in medical faculty. He submitted that   initially   all   the   petitioners   had   filed   the   petition before the learned Single Judge, which   was withdrawn and the petitioners may move for   revival   of   the   said   petition   or   file   fresh   Page 2 of 4 HC-NIC Page 2 of 4 Created On Wed Sep 23 02:30:10 IST 2015 C/MCA/2604/2015 ORDER petition.
2   Without   expressing   any   opinion   on   merits,   permission   is   granted.   Disposed   of   as   withdrawn."

5 Under the circumstances, the petitioners has now  moved the present application for recall of the order  dated 31.08.2015, passed by this Court for revival of  the petition.

6 Mr.   Nikhil   S   Kariel,   learned   advocate   for   the  petitioners,   has   submitted   that   the   petitioners   are  students and are pursuing a certain academic course,  which would affect all of them in the long run. For  the   said   reason,   though   the   prayers   made   in   the  petition  may   have  an  impact   on   the   public,   however,  they would also affect the petitioners personally. On  the above grounds, it is prayed that the relief prayed  for in the application may be granted.  7 Ms.   Shruti   Pathak,   learned   Assistant   Government  Pleader for respondents Nos. 1 and 2, had originally  appeared   in   the   main   petition   on   supply   of   advance  copy of the petition. As no Notice was issued in the  petition   and   the   petition   was   permitted   to   be  Page 3 of 4 HC-NIC Page 3 of 4 Created On Wed Sep 23 02:30:10 IST 2015 C/MCA/2604/2015 ORDER withdrawn,   the   learned   Assistant   Government   Pleader,  submits   that   she   has   no   instructions   from   the  respondents. She has, however, objected to the grant  of prayers made in the petition. 

8 Considering the averments made in the application  and the prayers made by the petitioners, the following  order is passed:

The order dated 31.08.2015, passed by this Court  in   Special   Civil   Application   No.   13958   of   2015,   is  hereby recalled. The said petition is directed to be  revived to its original status on file. 
(SMT. ABHILASHA KUMARI, J.) Bimal Page 4 of 4 HC-NIC Page 4 of 4 Created On Wed Sep 23 02:30:10 IST 2015