Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Mohammed Badruddin Ajmal vs Kamalakhya Dey Purkayastha And 2 Ors on 24 April, 2026

                                                                          Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010021472025




                                                                   undefined

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : Crl.Pet./100/2025

            MOHAMMED BADRUDDIN AJMAL
            S/O LATE AJMAL ALI HAJI ABDUL MAJID, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE
            DONKIGAON, PO AND PS HOJAI, DIST HOJAI, ASSAM 782435



            VERSUS

            KAMALAKHYA DEY PURKAYASTHA AND 2 ORS.
            S/O LATE KAUSHIK RANJAN DEY PURKAYASTHA RESIDENTOF SUBHASH
            NAGAR, SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ) TOWN, PO AND PS SRIBHUMI
            (KARIMGANJ) , DIST SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ) , ASSAM 788710

            2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
             REPRESENTED BY PP
            ASSAM

            3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE
             KARIMGANJ POLICE STATION PO AND PS SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ)
             DIST SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ)
            ASSAM
             PIN78871

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. M K HUSSAIN, MR. M ALOM,MS. F H AHMED,MRS. S Y
AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MD. A H LASKAR (R-1),MRS. S GOSWAMI (R-
1),MR. R GUPTA (R-1)




                                   BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
                                                                       Page No.# 2/2

                                      ORDER

Date : --24.04.2026 Heard Mr. M K Hussain, the learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears on call for the respondents. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, the learned Addl. PP appearing on behalf of State respondent.

From the record it is seen that in the 2/3 consecutive dates the respondents side remained absent though the names of three counsels have been reflected in the Cause List. Today notice was also given in the display for their information but, in spite of that none appears/represented the respondents.

In view of this, let the matter be listed on 29.04.2026 in Admission Column and in absent of respondents consequential order will be passed.

Interim be continued till next date of listing.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant