Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

G.Prabhakaran vs The Superintendent Of Police

                                                               1

                          BE F O R E THE MADURAI BE N C H OF MADRA S HIGH COUR T

                                                  DATED : 0 8. 0 8 . 2 0 1 9

                                                   CORAM:
                                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARA T HIDA S A N

                                            W.P.(MD)No. 1 5 1 1 0 of 2 0 1 9
                                                       and
                                           W.M.P.(MD).No. 1 1 6 1 6 of 2 0 1 9

                 G.Prabhakaran                                                     ... Petitioner
                                                    Vs.
                 1.The Superintendent of Police,
                    Office of the Superintendent of Police,
                    Tanjore,
                    Tanjore District.


                 2. The Inspector of Police,
                     South Police Station,
                     Ramanathan Roundana,
                     Tanjore,
                     Tanjore District.


                 3.The Commissioner,
                    Tanjore Corporation,
                    Tanjore,
                    Tanjore District.
                                                                                 ... Respondents




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                             2

                 Pray er:      Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                 praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 and
                 2, their men and agents from in any way interfering with the petitioner's business
                 in the name and style of Queen Ayurvedic Massage Health Centre, being carried
                 out at 12th Cross Street, Arulanathammal Nagar, Tanjore, Tanjore District.
                                       For Petitioner    : Mr.G.Chandrasekar
                                       For R1 & R2       : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi
                                                             Government Advocate (Crl.side)
                                      For R3             :   Mr.N.Dilipkumar


                                                     O R DE R

                          This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1

                 and 2 not to interfere with the peaceful conduct of the petitioner's business in the

                 name and style of Queen Ayurvedic Massage Health Centre at 12 th Cross Street,

                 Arulanathammal Nagar, Tanjore, Tanjore District.



                          2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, he is running a massage parlour

                 business in the name of “Queen Ayurvedic Massage Health Centre”. Now, the

                 respondents 1 and 2 are preventing the petitioner from running the business on

                 the ground that he is running the business without obtaining any license.

                 According to the petitioner, there is no requirement to get a license from any

                 authorities to run the Ayurvedic Massage Health Centre. But the respondents 1


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                      3

                 and 2 are interfering with the petitioner's business and unnecessarily harassing

                 him.



                          3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents,

                 on instructions, submitted that, now the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act,

                 1919 and the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920 have been amended with

                 effect from 06.07.2018, wherein, Schedule V of the Act, requires a license for

                 running a Haircut Saloon, Beauty Parlour, Spa or Massage Parlour. The relevant

                 portion of the Amendment Act reads as follows:-

                                          “(jj)Haircutting      S al o o n     or   b e a ut y     parlour,     witho ut
                           partition or roo m .
                                     (jjj)B e a ut y P arlo ur, s p a or m a s s a g e parlour, with partition
                           or roo m or s a u n a or bathing facilitie s:
                                  Pro vid e d     that no lice n c e         sh all b e    grant e d     unle s s   the
                           applica nt prod u c e s    no obj e c ti o n c e rtificat e s         fro m su c h   He alth
                           Offic e r and P olic e Offic e r as m a y b e s p e c ifi e d by the Ex e c u tiv e
                           auth ority.”



                          4. As per the above said amendment, to run a Beauty Parlour, Haircut

                 Saloon, Spa or Massage Parlour, the petitioners should necessarily get a license

                 from the Authorities concerned.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                          4




                          5. I have considered the rival submissions and also perused the materials

                 carefully.



                          6. Now the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920 as well as the

                 Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919, have been amended and as per the

                 amended provision, a license is required for running a Haircut Saloon, Beauty

                 Parlour, Massage Centre or Ayurvedic Spa. Admittedly, in the instant case, the

                 petitioner so far did not obtain any license. In the above circumstances, the prayer

                 sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. Hence, the Writ Petition stands

                 dismissed. However, it is always open to the petitioner to approach the Authorities

                 concerned seeking for license and after obtaining license, he can run the Salon,

                 Parlour, marriage parlour, and Spa Centre. No costs. Consequently, the connected

                 Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

                                                                                       0 8. 0 8 . 2 0 1 9




                 Index :Yes/No
                 Internet:Yes/No
                 akv




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                              5



                 To
                 1.The Superintendent of Police,
                    Office of the Superintendent of Police,
                    Tanjore,
                    Tanjore District.


                 2. The Inspector of Police,
                      South Police Station,
                      Ramanathan Roundana,
                      Tanjore,
                      Tanjore District.


                 3.The Commissioner,
                    Tanjore Corporation,
                    Tanjore,
                    Tanjore District.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                          6



                                   V.BHARA T HIDA S A N , J .

akv Order made in W.P.(MD)No. 1 5 1 1 0 of 2 0 1 9 Dated: 0 8. 0 8 . 2 0 1 9 http://www.judis.nic.in