Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 13, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Sohan Krishan Shakeet S/O Angnaram vs State Of Rajasthan on 21 July, 2020

Author: Manoj Kumar Vyas

Bench: Manoj Kumar Vyas

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

   S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3802/2020

Sohan    Krishan    Shakeet        S/o      Angnaram,           R/o     Vikasnagar
Bharatpur Ps Bharatpur Dist. Bharatpur
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. GS Fauzdar
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS

                                    Order

21/07/2020

Applicant has filed this bail application u/s 438 of Cr.P.C apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.172/2013 registered at Police Station Deeg (Bharatpur) for the offence/s punishable u/s 166, 167, 420, 406, 488, 409, 466, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 120B IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant. It has been submitted on behalf of the applicant that he is an old person of 71 years of age. He retired on 28.02.2011. The applicant was posted on the post of Assistant Executive Officer in the office of Nagar Palika Deeg from July 2010 to 28.02.2011. The FIR has been lodged on false grounds. He has not committed any offence. No evidence is available on record against him.

Perused the case dairy and factual report. As per direction of this court, the applicant appeared before the Investigating Officer. On the basis of investigation offence (Downloaded on 22/07/2020 at 08:58:55 PM) (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3802/2020] under Sections 409, 468, 471 and 474 and 120-B IPC has been made out against the petitioner. The amount involved in this matter is about Rs.1,85,500/-. The applicant was working as Public Servant and during this tenure as Public Servant this offence is alleged to have been committed.

Looking to overall facts and circumstances of the case, no case for anticipatory bail is made out.

Accordingly, the misc. bail application is dismissed.

(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J Sunita Kanwar /17 (Downloaded on 22/07/2020 at 08:58:55 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)