Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri R Venkatesh vs Sri Srinivas K on 1 September, 2023

Bench: Chief Justice, M.G.S. Kamal

                                        -1-
                                                  NC: 2023:KHC:31436-DB
                                                  CCC No. 1042 of 2022




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                    DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023

                                     PRESENT
             THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                        AND
                       THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
              CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1042 OF 2022 (CIVIL)


             BETWEEN:

                   SRI.R. VENKATESH
                   S/O RAMACHANDRASHETTY
                   AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
                   NO.98/A, 41/1, 30TH CROSS
                   JAYANAGAR, 7TH BLOCK
                   KANAKAPURA ROAD, BIDARAHALLI
                   BANGALORE - 560 070.

                                                          ...COMPLAINANT
Digitally    (BY SRI. SAMOD KHAN, ADVOCATE FOR
signed by        SRI. NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATES)
SUMA B N
Location:
High Court   AND:
of
Karnataka
             1.    SRI. SRINIVAS K.,
                   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
                   BANGALORE URBAN
                   K G ROAD
                   BANGALORE -560 001.

             2.    SRI. BHEEMA NAYAK
                   THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
                   VISWESWARAIAH CENTRE
                              -2-
                                     NC: 2023:KHC:31436-DB
                                      CCC No. 1042 of 2022




     PODIUM BLOCK
     3RD FLOOR
     BANGALORE - 560 001.

3.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
     BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
     VIDHANA SOUDHA
     DR AMBEDKAR BEEDHI
     BANGALORE - 560 001.

4.   YATHI RAJU
     THE CHIEF ENGINEER
     PUBLIC WORK DEPT.
     ANNEX BUILDING
     2ND FLOOR, K.R.CIRCLE
     BENGALURU - 560 001.

                                                  ...ACCUSED


(BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL A/W
    SRI. MILIND DANGE ADDL. GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

      THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER      SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF
THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT,         BY THE   COMPLAINANT,
WHEREIN HE PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT BE PLEASED
TO TAKEN COGNIZANCE AGAINST THE ACCUSED No.1 TO 3
FOR COMMITTING AN ACT OF CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT IN
DISOBEYING    THE   ORDER      DATED:25.08.2022     IN   WP
NO.15829/2022 AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH LAW.

      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

CHIEF JUSTICE, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                   -3-
                                                NC: 2023:KHC:31436-DB
                                                CCC No. 1042 of 2022




                                 ORDER

Pursuant to our order dated 22.08.2023, memo is filed in this Court today under caption "Memo of compliance".

2. Learned Additional Advocate General by inviting our attention to the statements in the memo particularly in unnumbered paragraph 2 submits that the order of which non-compliance is alleged is now duly complied with in letter and spirit.

3. Our attention was also invited to the copy of receipt of e-payment.

4. Considering all these aspects in our opinion the grievance of non compliance raised in the present contempt complaint no more survives. As such contempt complaint requires to be disposed of.

5. Before parting, we may record the submission of the learned Additional Advocate General. Learned -4- NC: 2023:KHC:31436-DB CCC No. 1042 of 2022 Additional Advocate General submits that there was a large sum amount involved in the matter towards compensation and in certain preliminary enquiry it was revealed that all relevant and material factors were not put forth before the competent authorities and the competent authorities probably were mislead by either erroneous statements or by putting forth incomplete material and as the money of public exchequer is involved the State Government be permitted to undertake an exercise of a thorough enquiry and further to take this exercise to its logical end.

6. We find considerable merit in the submission of learned Additional Advocate General. There cannot be any dispute on the proposition that public money cannot be utilized by adopting certain irregularities or illegalities and the State Government certainly would be at discretion to undertake an exercise of a thorough enquiry in such matters. Accordingly, we accept the submission of learned Additional Advocate General and permit the Government -5- NC: 2023:KHC:31436-DB CCC No. 1042 of 2022 to under the exercise if the Government proposes to undertake such exercise to unearth the truth.

Contempt complaint is disposed of. Notice discharged.

Sd/-

CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-

JUDGE SBN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2