Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

M/S. Vinayak Fuel Filling Station vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2019

Author: Sandeep Mehta

Bench: Sandeep Mehta

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
                    S.B. Civil Writ No. 655/2019

M/s. Vinayak Fuel      Filling Station, Through Its        Authorized
Representation Shri Rajendra Singh Bhati S/o Shri Fateh Singh
Bhati, Aged About 44 Years, R/o P.b. No. 83, State Highway No.
7 Hariyasar, Ghadsotan, Tehsil Sardarshahar, District Churu,
Rajasthan.
                                                       ----Petitioner
                                Versus
1.     Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Petroleum
       And Natural Gas, A-Wink, Shastri Bhawan, Rajendra
       Prasad Road, New Delhi- 110001.
2.     The Executive Director (O And D), Hindustan Petroleum
       Corporation Ltd., Petroleum House-17, Jamshedji Tata
       Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra - 400020.
3.     The General Manager (O And D), Hindustan Petroleum
       Corporation Ltd., First Floor, Shree Balaji Alpha Bazaar,
       First High Street, Law Garden, Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
       380009.
4.     The Deputy General Manager (O And D), Chhitroli Road,
       Bagru Terminal, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
5.     Petroleum And Explosives Safety Organisation, Through
       Deputy Chief Controller, Amrapalli Road, Near Power
       House, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
6.     State   Of   Rajasthan,     Through   The   Chief   Secretary,
       Secretariat, Jaipur.
                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)       :     Mr. Kuldeep Mathur
For Respondent(s)       :     Mr. Manoj Bhandari



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

Order 14/01/2019 Mr. Manoj Bhandari, Advocate, has entered caveat on behalf of the respondents Nos.2, 3 and 4 and has also filed reply (2 of 2) [CW-655/2019] to the writ eptition. Thus, notice returnable in four weeks be issued to the remaining respondents.

In the meantime, the supply being made to the petitioner retail outlet shall not be stopped subject to the condition that no insistence shall be made on on its behalf to put an additional lock on the truck tankers.

(SANDEEP MEHTA),J 210-Pramod/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)