Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Amit Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 11 April, 2023

Author: Anshuman

Bench: Anshuman

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       CRIMINAL REVISION No.993 of 2019
     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1435 Year-2016 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE
                                      District- Muzaffarpur
     ======================================================
1.    Amit Kumar Son of - Ramanand Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Sahbajpur
      Purana Zero Mile P.S.- Ahiyapur Dist- Muzaffarpur At Present reside
      mohalla- House No. 563 MIG, Road No. 1 Hariom Nagar P.S.- Adityapur
      District- Saraikela Kharsawan.
2.   Ramanand Singh Son of- Late Brahmdeo Singh, Resident of MOhalla-
     Sahbajpur Purana Zero Mile P.S.- Ahiyapur Dist- Muzaffarpur At Present
     reside mohalla- House No. 563 MIG, Road No. 1 Hariom Nagar P.S.-
     Adityapur District- Saraikela Kharsawan.
3.   Veena Singh Wife of - Ramanand Singh, Resident of MOhalla- Sahbajpur
     Purana Zero Mile P.S.- Ahiyapur Dist- Muzaffarpur At Present reside
     mohalla- House No. 563 MIG, Road No. 1 Hariom Nagar P.S.- Adityapur
     District- Saraikela Kharsawan.
4.   Chandraditya Kumar Son of - Braj Kishore Singh, Resident of Village-
     Dronpur, Jhapahan P.S.- Ahiyapur, Dist- Muzaffarpur.
5.   Vandana Kumari Wife of Chandraditya Kumar, Resident of Village-
     Dronpur, Jhapahan P.S.- Ahiyapur, Dist- Muzaffarpur.
                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar.
2.    Kumari Jaya @ Nikki wife of - Amit Kumar, Daughter of - Sunil Kumar,
      Resident of Village- Nawalpur Mishraulia, P.S.- Sakra Dist- Muzaffarpur.
                                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Adv.
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP.
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
     ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 11-04-2023

                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

      A.P.P. for the State.

                      The present Cr. Revision Application has been filed

      against the order dated 25.06.2019 passed by Additional District

      & Sessions Judge XIV, Muzaffarpur in Cr. Appeal No. 59 of 2018

      arising out of Case No.C-1435 of 2016 under Protection of
 Patna High Court CR. REV. No.993 of 2019 dt.11-04-2023
                                            2/4




         Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2015 as well as against the

         order dated 22.08.2017 passed by S.D.J.M., Muzaffarpur (East) in

         C-1435 of 2016 under Domestic Violence Act, by which, the court

         of S.D.J.M. has directed the petitioner no.1 to secure the proper

         and safe accommodation for opposite party No.2 in the house or

         in separate house, if opposite party No.2 wants so they shall keep

         her with full respect and dignity and shall pay Rs.20,000/-

         (Twenty Thousands Rupees) per month. It was also ordered that

         the payment of money shall be made on 15 th day of every month

         by depositing it in bank account of opposite party No.2.

                         Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both

         the orders are not sustainable due to three reasons. The first reason

         on which the counsel put emphasis that the order for residence

         cannot be made as an interim order and, as such, the order passed

         by original court and the order affirming the order passed by

         original court by the trial court are fit to be set-aside. In addition

         to that counsel for the petitioner has raised two more points, the

         first point he has raised is that the money fixed at Rs.20,000/- per

         month is without any reason and without any basis. It should be

         fixed as per the capacity of petitioner otherwise the order could

         not be complied. Learned counsel further submits that it is a case

         of Domestic Violence Act, therefore, it is necessary for the court

         to first held about the existence of domestic violence and then
 Patna High Court CR. REV. No.993 of 2019 dt.11-04-2023
                                            3/4




         provide relief under the said Act.

                         Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that

         Section 468 of Cr.P.C. i.e. the limitation in taking cognizance shall

         applicable in the present case.

                         Learned counsel for the State submits that both the

         orders have been passed completely in accordance with law. It has

         also been submitted that special power has been vested under

         Section 23 of the Act in the court to grant interim and ex-parte

         orders and in this view of the matter, the present order which is

         basically an order passed as an interim order and ex-parte order is

         absolutely a valid order and need no interference.

                         From the perusal of the documents and hearing the

         parties, it is admitted that a women who is subject to domestic

         violence has right to file an application for interim as well as

         residential relief. The said order to secure proper and safe

         accommodation for opposite party No.2 in the house or in

         separate house as well as to pay Rs.20,000/- for her maintenance

         is basically a protection order under Section 18 of Domestic

         Violence Act which has to be passed on being prima-facie

         satisfied that domestic violence has taken place or is likely to be

         taken place then pass a protection order in favour of aggrieved

         person and prohibit the respondents. Similarly order for payment

         of money is the subject matter of Section 18(e) of Domestic
              Patna High Court CR. REV. No.993 of 2019 dt.11-04-2023
                                                         4/4




                      Violence Act.

                                      This Court is of the view that Section 468 of Cr.P.C.

                      has applicability in the matter of Domestic Violence only at the

                      stage of applicability of Section 32 of Domestic Violence Act

                      where question of taking cognizance is involved. So far as

                      applicability of Section 468 of Cr.P.C. is concerned, this section

                      shall not apply in Domestic Violence Act prior to Section 32 of

                      Domestic Violence Act.

                                      Hence, in this view of the matter the said order is

                      basically an interim order and fit to be sustained, therefore, the

                      present Cr. Revision Application is hereby dismissed and the

                      order dated 25.06.2019 passed by Additional District & Sessions

                      Judge XIV, Muzaffarpur in Cr. Appeal No. 59 of 2018 arising out

                      of Case No.C-1435 of 2016 under Protection of Women from

                      Domestic Violence Act, 2015 as well as against the order dated

                      22.08.2017

passed by S.D.J.M., Muzaffarpur (East) in C-1435 of 2016 under Domestic Violence Act are hereby sustained.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Ritik/-

AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date