Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Pooja Ran I@ Alisha And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 27 September, 2016

Author: Inderjit Singh

Bench: Inderjit Singh

                                                                          118
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH

                          CRM No.M-34493 of 2016 (O&M)
                          Date of decision: September 27, 2016

Pooja Rani alias Alisha and another
                                                                 ...Petitioners

                                        Versus
State of Haryana and others
                                                              ...Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH


Present:    Mr. Amit K.Handa, Advocate
            for the petitioners.
                   ****


INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect their life and liberty and to provide adequate security to protect them from respondents No.4 to 6, who are parents and brother of petitioner No.1. The petitioners, who are present in Court today, further contend that they being major have solemnized marriage with their own consent in accordance with law. The private respondent are not accepting the marriage of the petitioners and are extending threats to them.

Heard.

Without going into the validity of the marriage and without saying anything regarding the status of the parties, the present petition is considered only for the purpose of protection of life and liberty of the petitioners. This petition is disposed of accordingly with the directions to the petitioners to contact respondents No.2 and 3, who, after their satisfaction that the petitioners are actually facing threat, shall take 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 02-10-2016 01:59:59 ::: CRM No.M-34493 of 2016 (O&M) -2- necessary steps to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners from private respondents No.4 to 6, as per law.

However, it is made clear that this order, in no way, will affect any other proceedings pending or to be filed against the petitioners etc., which are to be dealt with independently as per law.

September 27, 2016                                          (INDERJIT SINGH)
rajesh.k.khurana                                                 JUDGE


Whether speaking/reasoned                      :            Yes
Whether Reportable                             :            No




                                      2 of 2
                   ::: Downloaded on - 02-10-2016 02:00:00 :::