Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi

Atul Sharma, New Delhi vs Ito, New Delhi on 27 July, 2017

                                    1


          IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
              DELHI BENCHES: 'A', NEW DELHI

         BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
          AND MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                        ITA No. 5803/Del/2013
                              AY: 2010-11

Sh. Atul Sharma                               ITO
207, Lawyers Chamber                    vs.   Circle-37(1)
Delhi High Court                              New Delhi
New Delhi 110 003

PAN: AARPS 6964 J
      (Appellant)                             (Respondent)

       Assessee by              None.
       Department by            Sh. RK Dandey, Sr.D.R.


       Date of Hearing          27th July, 2017
       Date of                  27th July, 2017
       Pronouncement

                                 ORDER
PER R.K.PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 05th August, 2013 of the Ld. CIT(A)-XXVIII, New Delhi relating to the Assessment year (A.Y.) 2010-11.

2. This appeal was fixed for hearing from time to time and was last fixed for hearing on 09th Feb., 2017. Since none appeared on that date notice was sent by registered post with 2 acknowledgement due, fixing hearing of the case on 14th May, 2017. The assessee sought adjournment and the case was adjourned to 27th July, 2017. However when the name of the assessee was called today, there was nobody from the side of the assessee to represent the case, nor any petition seeking adjournment of the case was filed. This shows that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal filed by him.

3. Following the decision of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Multi Plan India Ltd. reported in 38 ITD 320 (Delhi), and the decision of Hon'ble M.P. High Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, reported in 223 ITR 480 (MP), and also the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of M/s Chemipol vs. UOI and others in Central Excise Appeal No. 62/2009 judgement dt. 17th September,2009, we consider it a fit case for dismissing the appeal in limine. However, if the assessee through proper application can satisfy the Tribunal for non-appearance on the date of hearing, the Tribunal may at its discretion recall this order.

4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine.

3

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 27th July,2017.

                   Sd/-                              Sd/-
      (SUCHITRA KAMBLE)                       (R.K. PANDA)
       JUDICIAL MEMBER                     ACCOUNTANT MEMBER


 Dated: 27th July, 2017


* Manga

 Copy forwarded to: -
 1.   Appellant
 2.   Respondent
 3.   CIT
 4.   CIT(A)
 5.   DR, ITAT

                    -     TRUE COPY   -




                                             By Order,




                                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
                                           ITAT Delhi Benches
                                                New Delhi