Kerala High Court
St.Mary'S Jacobite Syrian Church vs Mohammed Y. Safirulla on 16 November, 2016
Author: Shaji P. Chaly
Bench: Shaji P.Chaly
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY,THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2017/11TH MAGHA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 20 of 2017 (S) IN WP(C).35462/2016
----------------------------------------------------
AGAINST THE/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35462/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED
16.11.2016
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC:
-------------------------------
ST.MARY'S JACOBITE SYRIAN CHURCH
THENGODE, KAKKANAD P.O., ERNAKULAM-682030,
REPRESENTED BY ITS TRUSTEE, BABU KIZHAKKADATH
BY ADVS.SRI.K.C.ELDHO
SRI.JIJO THOMAS
SRI.MALLENATHAN.M.
SMT.KRISHNA SANTHOSH
RESPONDENT(S)/IST RESPONDENT IN WPC:
------------------------------------
MOHAMMED Y. SAFIRULLA
AGED AND FAHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
HOLDING THE POST OF DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM,
CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD P.O., ERNAKULAM-682030.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.KANNAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 31-01-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 20 of 2017 (S) IN WP(C).35462/2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A1: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.11.2016 IN W.P.
(C)NO.35462/2016 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
ANNEXURE A2: TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 24.11.2016
ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE A3: TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE
POSTING OF ANNEXURE 2
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
dlk
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
-----------------------------------------------
C.O(C). No.20 of 2017
-----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 31st day of January, 2017
JUDGMENT
This contempt of court case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 16.11.2016 are not complied with.
2. Today when the matter is taken up, learned Government Pleader has produced an order dated 9.1.2017, from which I am satisfied that the authority has already passed an order, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt of court case any further.
Contempt of court case is closed, accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY,JUDGE dlk/31/1/