Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Namdeo Kishanrao Sawant vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another on 25 March, 2022

Author: S. G. Dige

Bench: Sadhana S. Jadhav, S. G. Dige

                                                                      923-WP-7136-2021.odt



             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                        WRIT PETITION NO.7136 OF 2021

                        BHIMA PUNDLIK KHARAT
                               VERSUS
               THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

                                   WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO. 10100 OF 2021

                    AYUBKHAN SARDARKHAN PATHAN
                               VERSUS
               THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

                                   WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO. 7138 OF 2021

                       PANDIT DADARAO MULGIR
                               VERSUS
               THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

                                   WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO. 7137 OF 2021

                     NAMDEO KISHANRAO SAWANT
                               VERSUS
               THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

                                     ...
               Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Dinkar G. Kamble
             AGP for Respondent - State : Mrs. M. A. Deshpande
              Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S. V. Mundhe
                                     ...


                                CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV &
                                        S. G. DIGE, , JJ.

DATED : 25th MARCH, 2022.

1/2 ::: Uploaded on - 25/03/2022 ::: Downloaded on - 26/03/2022 11:56:02 :::

923-WP-7136-2021.odt PER COURT :

1. The learned counsel Mr. Mundhe appearing for respondent No.2 Municipal Council has submitted an affidavit and has stated that it was only due to COVID-19 pandemic situation that the pensionary benefits could not be released and disbursed in favour of the pensioners. The learned counsel further submits that by 30 th September 2022 the respondent No.2 would pay all pensionary benefits to the petitioner. Since the affidavit is filed on solemn affirmation that we are taking assurance of the respondent No.2 and we hope they will fulfill the same within stipulated time.
2. With these observations, the prayer in the Petitions have become infructuous, the Petitions stand disposed off.

(S. G. DIGE, J.) (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) Tandale/-

2/2 ::: Uploaded on - 25/03/2022 ::: Downloaded on - 26/03/2022 11:56:02 :::