Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Khaja Sharafudheen vs The District Collector on 20 October, 2020

Author: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

Bench: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

    TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 28TH ASWINA, 1942

                      WP(C).No.19388 OF 2020(W)


PETITIONER:

               KHAJA SHARAFUDHEEN,
               S/O. KHAJA IBRAHIM, CHERACHAM VEETIL,
               NIRAMARUTHUR P.O, TIRUR TALUK,
               MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 109

               BY ADV. SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH

RESPONDENTS:

      1        THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
               COLLECTORATE, UP HILL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
               PIN-676 505

      2        THE THAHSILDAR,
               TIRUR, CIVIL STATION, TIRUR TALUK,
               MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-676 101

      3        THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
               NIRAMARADUR VILLAGE, TIRUR TALUK,
               MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-676 109

      4        THE SUB REGISTRAR,
               TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
               KERALA, PIN-676 101


               SRI BIMAL K NATH, SR GP

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.10.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.19388 OF 2020                  2




                                   JUDGMENT

The above-captioned writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the 4th respondent to perform the registration of a proposed relinquishment deed without insisting for production of Record of Rights (RoR) certificate.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner approached the 4th respondent to get registered a relinquishment deed. The property is subject to certain attachment and the petitioner is intending to purchase the property along with the liability. The petitioner approached the 4th respondent to get the property registered and in the deed presented, he has mentioned about the court attachments and the pending litigations. According to the petitioner, the 4th respondent refused to register the deed on the ground that the petitioner had not produced the RoR certificate. It is in the above background that the petitioner has approached this Court seeking directions.

3. Sri. Bimal K. Nath, the learned Government Pleader on instructions submitted that no records have been produced by the petitioner to show that the document was in fact presented before the 4th respondent and that an order under Section 76 of the Registration Act, 1908 was passed by the Registrar refusing registration. It is submitted that if the document is presented, the same shall be considered and appropriate orders shall be passed. WP(C).No.19388 OF 2020 3

4. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the document would not be registered if the RoR certificate is not produced. This Court in Synudheen v. State of Kerala [2013 (1) KLT 221] and later in Jacob P.C. v. Village Officer, Ernakulam and Another [2020 (4) KHC 167] have held that production of RoR certificate is only optional and cannot be made mandatory and the registration officials concerned will not have jurisdiction to refuse registration on the mere ground that the party who presents the document has not produced the RoR certificate in respect of the property concerned.

In that view of the matter, this petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to present the document before the 4th respondent, within a period of three weeks from today. If the document is presented as above, the 4th respondent shall examine the same and act in terms of the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 and the Rules framed thereunder.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE DSV WP(C).No.19388 OF 2020 4 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

  EXHIBIT P1             THE TRUE COPY OF THE TITLE DEED OF
                         PROPERTY RE-SURVEY 369/3 AND 372/2 OF
                         NIRAMARUTHUR VILLAGE.

  EXHIBIT P2             THE TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN ORIGINAL
                         SUIT NO. 52/2018 OF SUB COURT, TIRUR.

  EXHIBIT P3             THE TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN ORIGINAL
                         SUIT NO. 56/2018 OF SUB COURT, TIRUR.

  EXHIBIT P4             THE TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER VIDE
                         IA NO. 743/2018 IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.
                         52/2018 OF SUB COURT, TIRUR.

  EXHIBIT P5             THE TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER VIDE
                         IA NO. 816/2018 IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.
                         56/2018 OF SUB COURT, TIRUR.

  EXHIBIT P6             THE TRUE COPY OF THE PROPOSED
                         RELINQUISHMENT TRANSFER DEED.

  EXHIBIT P7             THE TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                         RECEIPT DATED 15.07.19.

  RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL