Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Ratheesh M.N. vs M.V. Shaji on 1 February, 2021

Author: V. Ramasubramanian

Bench: V. Ramasubramanian

     ITEM NO.36                  Court 15 (Video Conferencing)               SECTION XI-A

                                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F        I N D I A
                                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                                     Civil Appeal Nos.468-469/2020

     RATHEESH M.N.                                                       Appellant(s)

                                                    VERSUS

     M.V. SHAJI & ORS.                                                   Respondent(s)

     (Only Civil Appeal No. 468-469 of 2020 to be listed before Judges-
     in-chambers.)

     Date : 01-02-2021 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
                                                   [IN CHAMBERS]

     For Appellant(s)                Mr. Arun Poomulli, Adv.
                                     Mr. Renjith B.Marar, Adv.
                                     Ms. Lakshmi N. Kaimal, AOR

     For Respondent(s)               Mr. Avneesh Arputham, AOR
                                     Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Adv.

                                     Mr. Dhaval Mehrotra, Adv.
                                     Mr. Sudhanshu Sikka, Adv.
                                     M/S. K Ashar & Co., AOR

                                     Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR

                           UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                              O R D E R

Mr. Arun Poomulli, learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent No.6 is dodging service and that his presence is not required so much as the presence of the other respondents and he may be permitted to give up respondent No.6.

In view of the above, respondent No.6 is ordered to be deleted from the array of parties.

Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by Rachna Date: 2021.02.03

Cause title be amended accordingly.

17:01:29 IST

Reason:

            (RACHNA)                                                   (MATHEW ABRAHAM)
     SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT                                           COURT MASTER