Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Nitinkumar Vithaldas Sagar vs State Of Gujarat on 16 January, 2026

                                                                                                              NEUTRAL CITATION




                              C/MCA/120/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 16/01/2026

                                                                                                              undefined




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                  R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 120 of 2026
                                  In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION/12755/2014
                       =============================================
                                               NITINKUMAR VITHALDAS SAGAR
                                                           Versus
                                                  STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
                       =============================================
                       Appearance:
                       MR NITINKUMAR V SAGAR(8632) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MS FORUM SHAH, AGP for the Opponent(s) No. 1
                       =============================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT

                                                          Date : 16/01/2026
                                                           ORAL ORDER

1. Heard Mr.Nitinkumar V. Sagar, the applicant, party-in- person, who happens to be the practicing Advocate and Ms.Nidhi Vyas, learned AGP appearing for the respondent State.

2. After hearing the learned advocates for the respective parties, prima facie, the order which is sought to be reviewed, which was passed by my predecessor on 30.09.2025 in Special Civil Application No.12755 of 2014, cannot be said to be a perverse order which requires interference of this Court while exercising its power of review, inasmuch as, the opening words of the said judgment would indicate that the said order was passed on a broad consensus and considering the submissions of the learned advocates for the respective parties and having placed reliance upon a decision of this Court in Urmila D. Patel vs. State of Gujarat and others - 2023 (1) GLH 622.

Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by GAURAV J THAKER(HC00951) on Fri Jan 16 2026 Downloaded on : Tue Jan 20 22:31:15 IST 2026

NEUTRAL CITATION C/MCA/120/2026 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2026 undefined

3. In view of the aforesaid, no case for review is made out by the applicant. Hence, the present application is rejected.

(MAULIK J. SHELAT, J) GAURAV J THAKER Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by GAURAV J THAKER(HC00951) on Fri Jan 16 2026 Downloaded on : Tue Jan 20 22:31:15 IST 2026