Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Punaji Govind Joshi And Anotehr vs The Charity Commissioner, Maharastra ... on 21 June, 2022

Author: Anuja Prabhudessai

Bench: Anuja Prabhudessai

                                                                                        904 fa 240-98.doc


                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                FIRST APPEAL NO. 240 OF 1998
                                                           WITH
                                              CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2085 of 1998

                              Punaji Govind Joshi & Anr.                      ..Appellants

                                          v/s.

                              The Charity Commissioner of Maharashtra
                              State, Bombay                                   ..Respondents

                                                           WITH
                                                 FIRST APPEAL NO. 793 OF 2009


                              Balkrishna Ramchandra Gurao & Ors.              ..Appellants

                                          v/s.

                              The Charity Commissioner of Maharashtra
                              State, Bombay   & Ors.                          ..Respondents

                              Mr. S.M.Kamble for the Appellant in FA/240/1998.
                              Mr.G.H.Keluskar for the Appellant in FA/793/2009.
                              Mr. A.H.Palekar for the Respondent No.3 in FA/240/1998.
                              Mr N.B.Patil, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.


                                                       CORAM : ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATED : 21st JUNE, 2022.

P.C.

1. Legal heirs of Respondent No.10A are not brought on record. No steps have been taken for restoration of Civil Application (St) in 4982 of 2003.

Digitally signed by PRASANNA

2. Mr. Palekar was earlier representing Respondent No.4 along with P PRASANNA P SALGAONKAR SALGAONKAR Date:

2022.06.23 18:24:07 +0530 P P SALGAONKAR 1 of 2 904 fa 240-98.doc Respondent No.3. He states that he has been informed that Respondent No.4 has also expired. Appellant to take necessary steps

3. Stand over to 12.07.2022.

(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) P P SALGAONKAR 2 of 2