Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Sarwant Singh Alias Ricky Alias Riki vs State Of Punjab on 31 May, 2023

Author: Karamjit Singh

Bench: Karamjit Singh

                                                              Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:079158




Neutral Citation Number                                     2023:PHHC:079158
Page No.                                      -:1:-
Case Number                                              CRM-M-50907-2022 (O&M)



            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                       AT CHANDIGARH

                                                      CRM-M-50907-2022 (O&M)
                                                      Date of Decision:-31.05.2023

SARWANT SINGH ALIAS RICKY ALIAS RIKI
                                                                               ... Petitioner
                                      Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
                                                                          ... Respondent


                -.-


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH

                -.-

Present:-       Mr. Gurmeet Singh Saini, Advocate
                for the petitioner.

                Mr. Chaman Lal Pawar, Addl. A.G. Punjab.

                -.-


KARAMJIT SINGH, J. (Oral)

CRM-24157-2023 In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the main case is ordered to be taken on board today itself. CRM-M-50907-2022

1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of regular bail in a case having FIR No.71 dated 12.5.2022 registered under Section 25 of Arms Act at Police Station City, District Rupnagar.





                                         1 of 3
                      ::: Downloaded on - 02-06-2023 04:02:02 :::
                                                             Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:079158




Neutral Citation Number                                   2023:PHHC:079158
Page No.                                     -:2:-
Case Number                                             CRM-M-50907-2022 (O&M)



2. The allegations in nut-shell are that on the basis of secret information, police apprehended the present petitioner and recovered 7 pistols of different bore and 15 live cartridges on 12.5.2022.

3. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case by the police and he is having no such criminal background and is involved only in one and her case that of assault only. The counsel for the petitioner further submits that after completion of investigation, police has presented the challan but it will take considerable time for the trial to conclude and all the offences are triable by the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class and that the petitioner is incarcerated for last more than 1 year. So prayer is made that the petitioner be released on regular bail.

4. Status report by way of affidavit of Mr. Tarlochan Singh, DSP(R) Rupnagar, filed on behalf of the State is ordered to be taken on record.

5. The instant petition is contested by the State counsel, who on instructions from ASI Baljit Singh submits that in the instant case large quantity of fire arms and ammunition were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. However the State counsel has not disputed the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 12.5.2022 and that after framing of charges prosecution has examined 4 witnesses out total 8 witnesses.

6. I have considered the submissions made by counsel for the parties.

7. Admittedly all the offences are triable by the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class and the alleged recoveries are already effected and 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 02-06-2023 04:02:03 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:079158 Neutral Citation Number 2023:PHHC:079158 Page No. -:3:- Case Number CRM-M-50907-2022 (O&M) the petitioner who is in custody for the last more than 1 year is presently lodged in judicial custody and it will take considerable time for the trial to terminate, so no fruitful purpose is going to be served by prolonging judicial custody of the petitioner for indefinite period.

8. Thus, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/CJM/Duty Magistrate concerned.




                                                         ( KARAMJIT SINGH)
31.05.2023                                                   JUDGE
Gaurav Sorot


                          Whether reasoned / speaking?       Yes / No

                          Whether reportable?                Yes / No




                                                               Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:079158

                                          3 of 3
                     ::: Downloaded on - 02-06-2023 04:02:03 :::