Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

M/S Tri-Star Products Pvt Ltd vs M/S Jagdamba Impex on 8 September, 2014

Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, Arun Mishra

                                                     1

                                  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   CIVIL APPEAL No.8593 OF 2014
                             (Arising out of SLP(C)No.22113 of 2014)


     M/S TRI-STAR PRODUCTS PVT LTD                                    .......APPELLANT


                                                   VERSUS


     M/S JAGDAMBA IMPEX                                              ......RESPONDENT

                                              WITH
                                   CIVIL APPEAL No.8594 OF 2014
                              (Arising out of SLP(C)No.22304 of 2014)

                                          O    R     D      E   R


                         Leave granted.

                         Having considered the impugned order, which is interim in

     nature, we are of the view that it was not proper for the High

     Court to interpret Section 15 of the Copyright Act with reference

     to the factual dispute between the parties.                    Accordingly, while

     disposing of the instant appeals, we set aside the observations

     recorded by the High Court, with reference to the applicability of

     Section 15 of the Copyright Act. It will be open to the trial court

     to independently examine the issue, based on the determination of

     the relevant facts, between the parties.

                         We are also satisfied that the observations recorded by

     the High Court in paragraph 16 of the impugned order to the effect,

     that the suit had been filed on the basis of incorrect legal advice
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
Satish Kumar Yadav
Date: 2014.09.10

     were totally unjustified.
15:49:21 IST
Reason:                                       The matter will be examined by the trial

     court without reference to the aforesaid determination by the High

     Court.
                                        2

           As noticed hereinabove, our denial for interference is

based on the fact that the impugned order pertains to an interim

claim,    raised    by   the    appellant.   We   would   in   the    aforesaid

situation, consider it just and appropriate to direct the trial

court, to expedite the disposal of the controversy between the

parties, preferably within one year from today.

           The     respondent    is   represented   before     this   Court   on

caveat.    Learned counsel for the respondent states that the cost

imposed on the appellant be waived.          Ordered accordingly.

           The appeals are disposed of in the above terms.



                                             ...........................J.
                                             (JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR)



                                             ...........................J.
                                             (ARUN MISHRA)
NEW DELHI;
SEPTEMBER 8, 2014.
                                   3


ITEM NO.30                 COURT NO.7               SECTION XIV

               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F       I N D I A
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 22113/2014

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/05/2014
in FAO No. 128/2014 passed by the High Court of Delhi at N. Delhi)

M/S TRI-STAR PRODUCTS PVT LTD                        Petitioner(s)

                                  VERSUS

M/S JAGDAMBA IMPEX                                   Respondent(s)

With I.A.No.1 (Appln.for permission to file additional documents)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 22304/2014
(With Interim Relief and Office Report)
With I.A.No.1 (Appln.for permission to file additional documents)

Date : 08/09/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

For Petitioner(s)    Mr.Akhil Sibal, Sr.Adv.
                     Mr.S.K.Bansal, Adv.
                     Mr.Ajay Amitabh Suman, Adv.
                     Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv.

For Respondent(s)    Mr.Chander M.Lall, Adv.
                     Mr.Rohit, Adv.
                     Mr.Subhash Bhutoria, Adv.
                     Mr. N. Ganpathy,Adv.

    Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                       O R D E R

Leave granted.

The appeals are disposed of in terms of the signed order.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PHOOLAN WATI ARORA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed order is placed on the file)