Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Sahitan Nessa vs The Union Of India And 5 Ors on 21 October, 2022

Author: M.R.Pathak

Bench: Manash Ranjan Pathak

                                                                   Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010080902018




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                          Case No. : WP(C)/2506/2018

         SAHITAN NESSA
         D/O- LT ANSER ALI, W/O- JAMAL UDDIN, R/O- VILL- PAKRIGURI, PO AND
         PS SALBARI, MOUZA- BIJNI, DIST- BAKSA (BTAD), ASSAM



         VERSUS

         THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS
         REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF
         INDIA, NEW DELHI

         2:THEE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
          REP. BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA
          NIRVACHAN SADAN
         ASHOKA ROAD
          NEW DELHI

         3:THE STATE OF ASSAM
          REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
          HOME DEPTT.
          DISPUR
          GHY-6

         4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
          BARPETA
          DIST- BARPETA
         ASSAM

         5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B)
          BARPETA
          DIST- BARPETA
         ASSAM
                                                                                            Page No.# 2/4

             6:THE STATE CO-ORDINATOR OF NRC
             ASSAM
              PO AND PS BHANGAGARH
              GHY-5
              DIST- KAMRUP (M)
             ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner     : MR. S ISLAM

Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.




                                    BEFORE
                  HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
                    HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA

                                                ORDER

Date : 21-10-2022 (M.R.Pathak, J) Heard Mr. S. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. K. Phukan, learned CGC for the respondent No. 1, Mr. A. I Ali, learned Standing counsel, Election Commission of India for the respondent No. 2, Ms. U. Das, learned Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent No. 3. Mr. G. Sarma, learned Standing counsel, Foreigners' Tribunal for the respondent Nos. 4 & 5 and Ms. L Devi, learned Standing counsel, State Co-ordinator, NRC for the respondent No. 6.

By communication dated 25.08.2022, the Superintendant of Police (Border) Barpeta, Assam requested the Registry of this Court to make necessary correction of the cause title of the concerned respondents, as the petitioner is a resident of Village Pakriguri, Police Station Salbari, Mouza Bijni in the District of Baksa. By the said communication dated 25.08.2022, it is also clarified that the impugned opinion/order dated 14.03.2018 passed by learned Member Foreigner's Tribunal Barpeta 10th in F. T. Case No. 07/2017 had already been sent to the Superintendent of Police (Border) Baksa.

It is to be noted herein that after the creation of BTC/BTAD Baksa District under BTC/BTAD was curved out from the erstwhile District of Barpeta and it is seen that the petitioner is a resident of Pakriguri, Salbari, Bijni District Baksa, the erstwhile District of Barpeta.

Page No.# 3/4 From the records of the relevant F.T. case No. 07/2017 it is seen that the Superintendant of Police (Border) Barpeta in November 1997 by its reference made under the IMDT Act 1983 sought for an opinion from the Foreigner's Tribunal Act 1993 in November 1997, during the force of said 1983 Act as to whether the petitioner is a foreigner or not.

After the said 1983 Act, was declared as unconstitutional in the case of Sarbananda Sonowal Vs. Union of India & Others by the Hon'ble Apex Court, the said reference was registered under the Foreigner's Act 1946 as F.T. Case No. 07/2017 and notice was issued to the petitioner by the concerned Tribunal, wherein she appeared and also filed her written statement and adduced evidence.

Accordingly, for proper adjudication of this case, the Deputy Commissioner, Barpeta, District-Barpeta, Assam respondent no. 4 as well as the Superintendant of Police (Border), Barpeta, District-Barpeta, Assam respondent No. 5 be substituted as the Deputy Commissioner, Baksa, BTAD, Baksa and the Superintendant of Police (Border) Baksa District Assam, respectively.

Registry shall accordingly do the needful by correcting the cause title.

Registry shall reflect the name of Mr. S. A. Ahmed as the counsel for the petitioner in the cause list who has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner by filing the necessary vakalatnama yesterday i.e., on 20.10.2022.

Issue rule, returnable by 8 (eight) weeks.

As the learned CGC; learned Standing Counsels and learned Government Advocate, Assam, named above, have accepted notices on behalf of the respondents, no formal notice need be issued to them.

Petitioner shall serve requisite extra copies of this writ petition including the Annexures appended thereto to Ms. K. Phukan, learned CGC, Mr. A. I Ali, learned Standing counsel, Election Commission of India, Mr. G. Sarma, learned Standing counsel, Foreigners' Tribunal, Ms. L Devi, learned Standing counsel, State Co-ordinator, NRC and Ms. U. Das, learned Government Advocate, Assam, by 26.10.2022, obtaining necessary acknowledgements from them in that regard.

As the petitioner has been declared to be a foreigner of post 25.03.1971 stream under the Foreigners Act, 1946 by the impugned opinion dated 14.03.2018 passed by learned Member Page No.# 4/4 Foreigner's Tribunal 10th Barpeta, Bajali, Pathsala in F. T. Case No. 07/2017 and without obtaining any prior written permission from the said authority, the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of said Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta, Assam.

Until further order, the petitioner shall not be arrested/detained in custody in terms of the impugned opinion dated 14.03.2018, passed by the learned Foreigners' Tribunal 10 th Barpeta in F. T. Case No. 07/2017.

Further the petitioner shall not be deported from the territory of India in pursuance of the impugned opinion dated 14.03.2018, passed by the learned Foreigners' Tribunal 10 th Barpeta in F. T. Case No. 07/2017.

List accordingly on a date to be fixed by the Registry.

                                           JUDGE                               JUDGE




Comparing Assistant