Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Arvind Kumar Roy @ Arvind Ray & Ors vs The State Of Bihar on 23 November, 2015

Author: Dinesh Kumar Singh

Bench: Dinesh Kumar Singh

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Criminal Miscellaneous No.53313 of 2015
                       Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2013 Thana -FULKAHA District- ARRARIA
                 ======================================================
                 1. Arvind Kumar Roy @ Arvind Ray son of Jyotish Rai
                 2. Ranjit Thakur son of Raj Kishore Thakur
                 3. Ganesh Prasad Gupta son of Late Hira Lal Gupta
                 Alls resident of village-/Mohalla- Fulkaha, Nawabganj, PS- Fulkaha,
                 District- Araria

                                                                                .... ....   Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                                .... .... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :  Mr. Arun Kumar Bhagat
                 For the Opposite Party/s   : Mr. Ram Shankar Das(Spl.P.P.)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR
                 SINGH
                 ORAL ORDER

02/ 23-11-2015

Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 504, 295A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 3(1)(x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and 3/4 of Prevention of Witch Practices Act.

It is alleged that the informant took a room on rent of Rs.1700/- per month and also given rupees fifty one thousand as security money, but subsequently the petitioners and others assaulted the informant and abused by calling caste name. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53313 of 2015 (2) dt.23-11-2015 2/2

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that for a civil nature of dispute the accusation has been levelled. Subsequently the informant has retracted from the initial version and filed a petition to that effect before the learned court below. A statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-4, Araria in connection with Fulkaha P.S. Case No. 34 of 2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/-

U           T