Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Anand Hanmant Patil vs The Assistant Director Of Land Records ... on 11 February, 2026

                                                             -1-
                                                                        NC: 2026:KHC-D:2056
                                                                   WP No. 100632 of 2026


                               HC-KAR



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
                                     DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                                       BEFORE
                                        THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA
                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 100632 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR)

                              BETWEEN:

                              ANAND S/O. HANMANT PATIL
                              AGED 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                              R/O. MAIGUR COLONY,
                              JAMKHANDI-587301, DIST: BAGALKOT.
                                                                                ...PETITIONER
                              (BY SRI. RAVICHANDRAGOUDA R. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

                              AND:

                              1.   THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF
                                   LAND RECORDS, MUDHOL,
                                   TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313.

                              2.   THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF
                                   LAND RECORDS, BAGALKOT,
                                   DIST: BAGALKOT-587103.

                              3.   THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF
           Digitally signed
           by MANJANNA             LAND RECORDS, BELAGAVI,
           E

MANJANNA
           Location: HIGH
           COURT OF
                                   DIST: BELAGAVI-590001.
           KARNATAKA
E          DHARWAD
           BENCH
           Date:
           2026.02.19
           14:53:26 +0530
                              4.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                                   DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
                                   REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
                                   VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.
                                                                              ...RESPONDENTS
                              (BY SMT. NANDINI B. SOMAPUR, AGA)

                                   THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
                              CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
                              DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONDUCT SURVEY AND FIX
                              BOUNDARIES OF LANDS BEARING SY.NO.167/14 AND 168/1E OF
                              MUDHOL TALUK, BAGALKOT DISTRICT WITHIN A TIME FRAME FIXED
                              BY THIS HON'BLE COURT AND ETC.
                             -2-
                                         NC: 2026:KHC-D:2056
                                      WP No. 100632 of 2026


HC-KAR



    THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:   THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA

                        ORAL ORDER

1. Learned Addl. Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.1-Assistant Director of Land Records (ADLR), Mudhol to conduct survey and fix the boundaries of the lands bearing Survey Nos.167/14 and 168/1E situated at Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District within a time frame.

3. Brief facts:

3.1. The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner and recorded holder of the lands bearing Survey Nos.167/14 and 168/1E situated at Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District.
3.2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite repeated requests, the revenue authorities have -3- NC: 2026:KHC-D:2056 WP No. 100632 of 2026 HC-KAR failed to conduct survey and fix the boundaries of his lands.
3.3. Respondent No.1 - the Assistant Director of Land Records (ADLR), Mudhol, who is the statutory authority, is empowered and obligated under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act and the Rules framed thereunder to conduct surveys and effect boundary fixation.
3.4. It is the specific case of the petitioner that, respondent No.2 - the Deputy Director of Land Records (DDLR), has issued a specific direction to the ADLR to conduct survey of the petitioner's lands (Annexure-E).
3.5. Further, respondent No.3 - the Joint Director of Land Records (JDLR), who exercises supervisory control over the ADLR, had also issued a categorical direction to conduct the survey of petitioner's land (Annexure-G). -4-

NC: 2026:KHC-D:2056 WP No. 100632 of 2026 HC-KAR 3.6. Despite such specific directions issued by respondent Nos.2 and 3, respondent No.1 has failed to conduct the survey and has instead issued an endorsement dated 12.11.2025 (Annexure-F) declining to conduct the survey on whimsical grounds.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, respondent No.1 being a statutory authority, is bound not only by the statutory mandate under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, but also by the supervisory and administrative directions issued by his higher authorities. The failure to comply with such directions is arbitrary and illegal.

5. Per contra, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the respondents - State fairly submits that, respondent No.1 - ADLR being a statutory authority, is bound by the directions issued by respondent Nos.2 and 3 - DDLR and JDLR respectively, and that -5- NC: 2026:KHC-D:2056 WP No. 100632 of 2026 HC-KAR appropriate directions would be issued to ensure compliance.

6. This Court has carefully considered the rival submissions and perused the material on record.

7. The DDLR and the JDLR, who exercise supervisory and administrative control over the ADLR, have issued specific directions to conduct survey of the petitioner's lands (Annexures - E and G respectively). The failure of respondent No.1 - ADLR to comply with such directions and issuance of the endorsement dated 12.11.2025, without conducting the survey, is unsustainable in law.

8. Non-conduct of the survey, despite explicit directions, affects the petitioner's right to peacefully enjoy his property and amounts to infringement of his constitutional right under Article 300A of the Constitution of India.

-6-

NC: 2026:KHC-D:2056 WP No. 100632 of 2026 HC-KAR

9. Under the circumstances, respondent No.1 is directed to conduct the survey and fix the boundaries of the lands bearing Survey Nos.167/14 and 168/1E situated at Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District, after issuing notice to all concerned stakeholders.

10. The petitioner shall appear before the ADLR on 03.03.2026 at 3.00 p.m. and cooperate in the survey proceedings. The entire survey process with notice to stakeholders shall be conducted within two months thereafter.

11. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/-

JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA gab Ct:VH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20