Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Lakshmi Raj Gudimella vs Atmakury Kesava Prabhu on 29 August, 2022

Author: A.A.Nakkiran

Bench: A.A.Nakkiran

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  Date : 29.08.2022

                                                      CORAM:

                                   THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

                                                T.O.S.No.32 of 2013

                                               (O.P No.604 of 2011)

                     Atmakury Kamala (died)
                     1. Lakshmi Raj Gudimella
                     2.Padma Krishna Yekkirala
                     3.Manga Anantatmula
                     4.Varalakshmi Kanduru                               ...Petitioners/plaintiffs


                                                    vs.
                     1.Atmakury Kesava Prabhu
                     2.Atmakury Sri Ranganath                         ...Respondents/Defendants



                     Prayer: Testamentary Original Suit is filed under Sections 232, 255 and

                     276 of Indian Succession Act XXIX of 1925, praying that the petitioner

                     Atmakury Kamala as wife and as she is the sole Universal Legatee

                     mentioned under the Will of the deceased, having effect limited to the State

                     of Tamilnadu and limited to the property mentioned in the affidavit of

                     assets.

                     1/4


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                              For Plaintiffs     : M/s.L.N.Prakasham

                                              For Defendants     : M/s.J.Pothiraj for D1
                                                                   M/s.G.Sridevi for D2


                                                        JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners/plaintiffs seeks permission of this court to withdraw this suit and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners/plaintiffs, this suit is dismissed as withdrawn.

No costs.

29.08.2022 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes Speaking/Non-speaking order gv 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.A.NAKKIRAN,J.

gv T.O.S.No.32 of 2013 (O.P No.604 of 2011) 29.08.2022 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis