Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Mohammed Badruddin Ajmal vs Kamalakhya Dey Purkayastha And 2 Ors on 16 October, 2025

                                                                          Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010021472025




                                                                   undefined

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : Crl.Pet./100/2025

            MOHAMMED BADRUDDIN AJMAL
            S/O LATE AJMAL ALI HAJI ABDUL MAJID, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE
            DONKIGAON, PO AND PS HOJAI, DIST HOJAI, ASSAM 782435

            VERSUS

            KAMALAKHYA DEY PURKAYASTHA AND 2 ORS.
            S/O LATE KAUSHIK RANJAN DEY PURKAYASTHA RESIDENTOF SUBHASH
            NAGAR, SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ) TOWN, PO AND PS SRIBHUMI
            (KARIMGANJ) , DIST SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ) , ASSAM 788710

            2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
             REPRESENTED BY PP
            ASSAM

            3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE
             KARIMGANJ POLICE STATION PO AND PS SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ)
             DIST SRIBHUMI (KARIMGANJ)
            ASSAM
             PIN78871

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. M K HUSSAIN, MR. M ALOM,MS. F H AHMED,MRS. S Y
AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MD. A H LASKAR (R-1),MRS. S GOSWAMI (R-
1),MR. R GUPTA (R-1)




                                   BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA

                       HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
                                                                     Page No.# 2/2


                                      ORDER

Date : 16.10.2025.

Heard Mr. M.K. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also hear Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P., Assam for the State respondent. However, the respondent No.1/complainant remains unrepresented. Due to paucity of time, the hearing could not be taken. It is further submitted by Mr. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P., Assam that the scan copy of the TCR is necessary for hearing of the matter. In view of above, let the scan copy of the TCR be called for. Registry will do the needful.

List the matter on 12.11.2025.

Till then, the interim order passed earlier shall continue.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant