Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

The State Of Maharashtra vs Sheetal on 23 January, 2019

      ITEM NO.59                        REGISTRAR COURT. 2                   SECTION IX

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F        I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


                                        BEFORE THE REGISTRAR RAJESH KUMAR GOEL

      Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                   No(s).   21645/2018

      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.                                     Petitioner(s)

                                                      VERSUS

      SHEETAL & ORS.                                                      Respondent(s)

      (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.102074/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY
      IN FILING and IA No.102075/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )

      WITH
      SLP(C) No. 27404/2018 (IX)
      (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.114859/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY
      IN FILING and IA No.114864/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE
      IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.114866/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
      and    IA     No.114861/2018-PERMISSION   TO    FILE    ADDITIONAL
      DOCUMENTS/FACTS)

      Date : 23-01-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.



      For Petitioner(s)                Mr.Anoop Kandari,Adv.
                                       Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR

                                       Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR

      For Respondent(s)


                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R
SLP(C) No.21645/2018

As per postal tracking report qua respondent No.1, the remarks indicates that “Insufficient address”. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of Signature Not Verified notice already issued to respondent No.1 within a period of four Digitally signed by SUSHMA KUMARI BAJAJ Date: 2019.01.23 weeks.

15:57:19 IST Reason:

………..2 ITEM NO.59 -2- Service is complete qua respondent Nos.2 & 3 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
I.A. for intervention filed by Ms.Anagha S.Desai,Advocate is found to be defective. Four weeks time is given to cure the defects.
List the matter again on 11.03.2019.
SLP(C) No. 27404/2018
Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to file the spare copies for issuance of notice to the respondents within the period prescribed under the rules, hence notice could not be issued. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders and list thereafter.
RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar SB