Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

A.Palanivel vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 3 September, 2020

Author: Pushpa Sathyanarayana

Bench: Pushpa Sathyanarayana

                                                                         W.P.No.16990 of 2013

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             DATED 03.09.2020

                                                     CORAM

                      THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

                                            W.P.No.16990 of 2013

                  A.Palanivel                                              .. Petitioner

                                                      -vs-

                  The State of Tamil Nadu,
                  Rep. by its Inspector of Police,
                  Naduveerapattu Police Station,
                  Panrutty Taluk,
                  Cuddalore District.                                      .. Respondent


                  Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue
                  a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to grant permission to
                  conduct cultural program (Dance and Music Program) in the Sri Maga
                  Mariyamman Kovil situated at Arachikuppam Pathira Kottai Post,
                  Panrutty Taluk, Cuddalore District scheduled to be held on 26.06.2013
                  from 7.00 p.m. to 12.00 a.m.


                           For Petitioner        : Mr.P.Paramasiva Doss

                           For Respondent        : Mr.V.Shanmugasundar
                                                   Special Government Pleader

                                                     ORDER

This writ petition is heard through Video Conference on account of COVID-19 pandemic situation.

1/2

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.16990 of 2013 PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

gg/rsi

2. Today, the matter was listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous.

4. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

03.09.2020 gg/rsi To The Inspector of Police, Naduveerapattu Police Station, Panrutty Taluk, Cuddalore District.

W.P.No.16990 of 2013 2/2

http://www.judis.nic.in