Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Rail Land Development Authority vs M/S Yantti Buildcon Pvt Ltd on 9 May, 2014

ÀITEM NO.41                       COURT NO.12                   SECTION IVA

              S U P R E M E        C O U R T   O F    I N D I A
                                RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)
No(s).12351-12352/2014

(From the judgement and order dated 22/01/2014 in MFA
No.595/2014 dated 06/02/2014 in MFA No.595/2014 of The HIGH COURT
OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE)


RAIL LAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY                                 Petitioner(s)

                      VERSUS

M/S YANTTI BUILDCON PVT LTD                                     Respondent(s)

(With prayer for interim relief and office report)


Date: 09/05/2014       These Petitions were called on for hearing
                         today.


CORAM :
          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI


For Petitioner(s)        Mr.   Amit Kumar,Adv.
                         Mr.   Ankit Rasgarhia,Adv.
                         Mr.   Avijit Manitripathi,Adv.
                         Ms.   Rekha Bakshi,Adv.

For Respondent(s)        Mr.   Basava Prabhu S. Patil,Sr.Adv.
                         Mr.   B. Subrahmanya Prasad,Adv.
                         Mr.   Anirudh Sanganeria,Adv.
                         Mr.   Nandish Patil,Adv.

              UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                                  O R D E R

We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court. In fact this impugned interim order itself arose out of an interim order passed by the Trial Court.

1

In the interest of justice and to put an end to the present controversy, we feel that the Trial Court can be directed to dispose of the interim application itself at an early date. Both, the counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel for the caveator representing the respondent, agreed to the abovesaid course.

Therefore, these special leave petitions stand disposed of with a direction to the learned IV Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Mayohall Unit, Bengaluru to dispose of A.A. No.25001/2014 expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of production of a copy of this order.



 (Narendra Prasad)                          (Sharda Kapoor)
    Court Master                              Court Master
2