Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 1]

Chattisgarh High Court

Sachin Kumar Kashyap vs State Of Chhattisgarh 21 ... on 2 July, 2018

                                          1

                                                                          NAFR

             HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                               MCRC No. 4370 of 2018

   • Sachin Kumar Kashyap S/o Nandram Kashyap Aged About 20 Years Caste-
     Kurmi, R/o- Village Salkhan, Police Station Shivrinarayan, Tahsil Navagarh,
     District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

                                                                    ---- Applicant

                                       Versus

   • State of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station Hasoud, District- Janjgir-
     Champa, Chhattisgarh

                                                                 ---- Respondent

For Applicant : Shri Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Wasim Miyan, PL for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 02/07/2018

1. This is the First Bail Application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested on 26.01.2018 in connection with Crime No.26/2018 registered at Police Station Hasoud, District Janjgir - Champa (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366 & 376 IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act.

2. As per the prosecution case, a missing report was filed by the father of the prosecutrix on 15.01.2018 that the present applicant has enticed away the minor girl from the lawful custody of the parents and thereafter committed forceful sexual intercourse with the girl.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been 2 falsely implicated. He further submits that the prosecutrix has been examined in this case before the Court below and she has not supported the case of the prosecution and even she has disowned the happening the of the incident, therefore, the applicant may be released on bail.

4. State counsel is not able to dispute the fact that the prosecutrix has not supported the case of the prosecution.

5. Perused the statement of the prosecutrix, wherein she has not supported the case of the prosecution. Considering the same without any observation on merits, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

6. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given by the said Court.

Sd/-

Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu