Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Hsidc ( Now Hsiidc ) vs Ajit Singh And Ors on 6 April, 2018

Author: G.S.Sandhawalia

Bench: G.S.Sandhawalia

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                    AT CHANDIGARH

                                         RFA No.3009 of 2011 (O&M)
                                         Date of Decision: 19.03.2018

Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited now known
as Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation
Limited.
                                                       .... Appellant(s).
                   Versus

Ajit Singh and others
                                                           ....Respondent(s).

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA.
                    ****
Present: Mr.Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate for HSIIDC.

            Mr.Shailendra Jain, Senior Advocate with
            Mr.Satyendra Chauhan, Advocate,
            Mr.Pawan Kumar, Senior Advocate with
            Mr.Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate,
            Mr.R.A.Yadav, Advocate
            Mr.Pradeep Chokhar, Advocate for
            Mr.P.R.Yadav, Advocate,
            Mr.Anil Kumar Rana, Advocate, for the land owners.

            Mr.Sudeep Mahajan, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana,
            Ms.Safia Gupta, AAG, Haryana.



                                ***
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.

The notification in the present case is '26.02.2002', however, in the impugned award, it has been wrongly mentioned as 26.06.2002 and in para No.11 of the judgement itself reference has been made to the correct date of notification as 26.02.2002.

This Court in RFA No.2373 of 2010 titled "Madan Pal (III) Vs. State of Haryana and another" and other connected appeals, on 09.03.2018, has already fixed the compensation for the said villages @ Rs.41.40 lacs per acre for notification dated 26.02.2002. Relevant part 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 07-05-2018 08:21:06 ::: -2- of the judgement dated 09.03.2018 reads as under:-

"140. Accordingly, the appeals filed by the HSIIDC seeking reduction in the compensation and of MSIL are dismissed and those of the land owners alongwith cross-objections are allowed.
(i) The market value of the land falling in five village i.e. Naharpur Kasan, Kasan, Bas Huria, Bas Khusla and Dhana is assessed @ Rs.41.40 lakhs per acre alongwith all statutory benefits.
(ii) The market value of land in village Manesar is assessed @ Rs.62.10 lakhs per acre alongwith all statutory benefits.
(iii) The appellant-M/s Kohli Holdings Private Limited in RFA No.4646 of 2010 would be entitled for compensation Rs.62.10 lakhs per acre, on account of it being given benefit of 50% of locational advantage being situated on the highway and in village Manesar apart from that it would be entitled for 30% more compensation on account of severance charges on the abovesaid market value alongwith all statutory benefits.
(iv) The directions of the Apex Court in the case of Pran Sukh will also be adhered to while disbursing the balance amount of compensation.
(v) Where appeals have been filed by the land owners which were beyond period of limitation and applications have been filed for condoning the delay with a condition that the land owners will not be entitled for the interest during the said period, the Executing Court shall ensure that the amounts are calculated and disbursed, keeping in the view the said condition which has been passed in the case of each and individual land owner.
(vi) The appeals filed by the MSIL are dismissed on account of non-maintainability and in view of the observations of the Apex Court in the case of Satish Kumar Gupta (supra) being a post notification allottee."

2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 07-05-2018 08:21:07 ::: -3- The present appeal is dismissed in the same terms.




                                              (G.S.SANDHAWALIA)
March 19, 2018                                        JUDGE
raman

          Whether speaking/reasoned                Yes/No
          Whether reportable                       Yes/No




                              3 of 3
           ::: Downloaded on - 07-05-2018 08:21:07 :::