Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

T.Rathinasapabathy vs The Secretary To Government on 12 September, 2016

Author: B.Rajendran

Bench: B.Rajendran

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS 

DATED:       12.09.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

WP.No.31695 of 2016

1.T.Rathinasapabathy
2.A.Swaminathan
3.M.Chandrasekaran
4.R.Munusamy
5.David
6.M.Thangaraj
7.Gajapathy
8.K.Revumani
9.K.Jayaprakash Narayanan
10.M.Muthu
11.K.Selvakani
12.D.Venkatesan
13.B.Rajini
14.B.Sureshkumar
15.A.Krishnamoni
16.C.Kumaresan									Petitioner

          Vs

1.The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department 
Fort St.George, Chennai-9

2.The Special Commissioner cum Land Reforms Commissioner 
Chepauk, Chennai-9

3.The District Collector, Chennai 

4.The Tahsildar, Velacherry Taluk
Chennai-42										 Respondents

Prayer:- This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 4th Respondent to consider the representations of the Petitioners dated 11.12.2014 and 14.6.2016 with regard to allotment of house through the 3rd Respondent to the Petitioners in the light of the GO.Ms.No.649 Revenue Department dated 20.12.2003 within a stipulated time.
		For Petitioner 		:	Mr.M.Ramadass
		
		For Respondent 	:	Mr.P.Chinnadurai, GA-RR1,2,4&5
							Mr.B.Kesavan-R3

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 4th Respondent to consider the representations of the Petitioners dated 11.12.2014 and 14.6.2016 with regard to allotment of house through the 3rd Respondent to the Petitioners in the light of the GO.Ms.No.649 Revenue Department dated 20.12.2003 within a stipulated time.

2. This court heard the learned counsel on either side and also perused the materials placed on record.

3. Considering the limited prayer sought for in this Writ Petition, without going into the merits of the case, the 4th respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representations of the petitioners dated 11.12.2014 and 14.6.2016, on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.

4. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

12.09.2016 Index:Yes/No Web:Yes/No Srcm To:

1.The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department Fort St.George, Chennai-9
2.The Special Commissioner cum Land Reforms Commissioner Chepauk, Chennai-9
3.The District Collector, Chennai
4.The Tahsildar, Velacherry Taluk Chennai-42 B.RAJENDRAN, J.

Srcm WP.No.31695 of 2016 12.09.2016