Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Yoga vs P.Raj Kumar on 14 February, 2020

Author: R.Mahadevan

Bench: R.Mahadevan

                                                                          Crl.R.C.No.1411 of 2017

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED : 14.02.2020

                                                        CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

                                              Crl.R.C.No.1411 of 2017

                      Yoga                                                      ... Petitioner

                                                          Vs.

                      P.Raj Kumar                                               ... Respondent


                             Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 r/w 401
                      of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to call for records and set
                      aside the impugned order passed by the learned Judge, Family Court
                      at Vellore in F.C.M.C.No.91 of 2014 dated 02.08.2017.


                                  For Petitioner      : No appearance

                                  For Respondent       : Mr.L.Rajasekar


                                                       ORDER

The challenge made in this Criminal Revision Case is to the order dated 02.08.2017 passed by the Family Court, Vellore in FC.MC.No.91 of 2014, whereby, the case filed by the petitioner / wife seeking monthly maintenance of Rs.30,000/- per month from the respondent, was dismissed. http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.R.C.No.1411 of 2017 R.MAHADEVAN, J.

kas

2.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondent / husband submitted that during the pendency of this case, the petitioner got remarried.

3.On the other hand, there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or through her learned counsel, on the previous hearing i.e., on 10.02.2020 as well as today.

4.Hence, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non-prosecution.

14.02.2020 kas Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No To Family Court Vellore Crl.R.C.No.1411 of 2017 http://www.judis.nic.in