Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Goutam Namasudra vs The State Of Assam on 1 December, 2020

Author: Rumi Kumari Phukan

Bench: Rumi Kumari Phukan

                                                                                     Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010135872020




                               THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                     Case No. : AB/2733/2020

             GOUTAM NAMASUDRA
             S/O SRI GOPENDRA NAMASUDRA, R/O PADMARPAR, P.S. NILAMBAZAR,
             DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM



             VERSUS

             THE STATE OF ASSAM
             REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM



Advocate for the Petitioner    : MR H R A CHOUDHURY

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM


                                             BEFORE
                    HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
                                             ORDER

01-12-2020.

By this application under Section 438 CrPC, petitioner, namely, Goutam Namasudra, has sought for pre-arrest bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Nilam Bazar PS Case No. 209/2020, under Sections 376/354/325 IPC.

Heard the learned counsel for both the parties.

Also perused the record and Case Diary.

The victim is a married woman and the accused hide himself below the bed of the victim at the time when she and her husband went outside to attend the nature's call. Immediately, on their Page No.# 2/2 return, the accused by administering some substance, made them unconscious and committed rape upon the victim woman. The victim and other witnesses have given a detailed description of the incident and there appears no any other ground to discard their statement.

Considering the nature of accusations and the complicity of the accused petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of pre-arrest bail to him. Accordingly, the bail application is hereby rejected.

Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant