Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.Samson Foundations vs Regus Granduer Offices Private Limited on 12 October, 2023

Author: C.Saravanan

Bench: C.Saravanan

                                                                      Arb..O.P(Com.Div). No.343 of 2023

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 12.10.2023

                                                     CORAM :

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

                                          Arb.O.P(Com.Div).No.343 of 2023

                M/s.Samson Foundations,
                Rep by its Partner,
                Mr.Hamir Sampat,
                Office at 191, Demellows Road,
                Opp Natraj Theatre, Choolai,
                Chennai – 600 112.                                          ... Petitioner
                                                       Vs.

                Regus Granduer Offices Private Limited,
                Level 4, Dynasty Business Park,
                Andheri Kurla Road, Andheri East,
                Mumbai – 400 059.                                         ... Respondent



                Prayer: Original Petition is filed under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitration

                and Conciliation Act read with Rule 2 of the Appointment of Arbitrators of

                Madras High Court Scheme, 1996, praying to appoint a sole Arbitrator to

                resolve the disputes between the petitioner and the respondent in terms of the

                lease deed dated 31.08.2015.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                1/4
                                                                            Arb..O.P(Com.Div). No.343 of 2023

                                  For Petitioner           : Mr.P.Giridharan

                                  For Respondents          : Mr.Vijay R.Sekar



                                                         ORDER

The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the lease agreement dated 31.08.2015 is unstamped and therefore Clause 27 of the said lease agreement is not valid and therefore in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in N.N.Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. Indo Unique Flame Limited and others [(2023) 7 SCC 1], the petition for appointment of an Arbitrator on the strength of the aforesaid lease deed dated 31.08.2015 does not survive.

2. It appears that a curative petition has been moved before the Hon'ble Supreme Court to review the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in N.N.Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. Indo Unique Flame Limited and others [(2023) 7 SCC 1]. It is likely to be listed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and to be heard.

3. Considering the above, this Original Petition is dismissed for statistical purpose for the present with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4 Arb..O.P(Com.Div). No.343 of 2023 after review orders are passed in the curative petition. In case, the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in N.N.Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. Indo Unique Flame Limited and others [(2023) 7 SCC 1] is reversed, the petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court. In the alternative, the petitioner may pay the deficit stamp duty and file a fresh application.

4. This Original Petition is closed for the present with the above liberty. No costs.

12.10.2023 jas https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4 Arb..O.P(Com.Div). No.343 of 2023 C.SARAVANAN, J.

jas Arb.O.P(Com.Div).No.343 of 2023 12.10.2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4