Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Sri Manali Ramakrishna Mudliar vs The District Registrar on 25 September, 2023

Author: B.Pugalendhi

Bench: B.Pugalendhi

                                                                               W.P.(MD)No.23306 of 2023


                         BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED : 25.09.2023

                                                        CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                             W.P.(MD)No.23306 of 2023

                Sri Manali Ramakrishna Mudliar
                            Family Charities,
                Rep. by its Custodian Mr.Ramasamy,
                No.144/80, North Chitra Street,
                Srirangam,
                Trichy – 600 009.                                               ... Petitioner
                                                          vs.
                The District Registrar,
                Tiruchirappalli District,
                Trichy.                                                         ... Respondent


                          Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to dispose
                of the complaint filed by the petitioner dated 15.12.2022 on the file of the
                respondent herein.
                                       For Petitioner    : Mr.V.Illanchezian
                                       For Respondent : Ms.D.Farjana Ghoushia,
                                                        Special Government Pleader




                1/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             W.P.(MD)No.23306 of 2023



                                                      ORDER

The petitioner claims that the subject properties originally belongs to the Trust, namely, Sri Manali Ramakrishna Mudaliar Family Charities. However, the said properties have been fraudulently sold to some persons. In this regard, the petitioner gave a complaint before the respondent on 15.12.2022 to enquire into the alleged fraudulent transaction and to cancel the documents registered in respect of the subject properties. Since there was no action on the said complaint, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

2. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Satya Pal Anand v. State of M.P., [(2016) 10 SCC 767] has held that that the power to cancel the registration is a substantive matter and in the absence of any express provision on that behalf, it is not open to assume that the Registering Officer would be competent to cancel the registration of the documents in question. Therefore, for cancellation of registered documents, the State of Tamil Nadu brought an amendment to the Registration Act, vide the Registration (Tamil Nadu 2/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.23306 of 2023 Second Amendment) Act, 2021. By this amendment Act, Sections 22B, 77A, 77B, 81A and 81B were inserted in the Registration Act. Section 77A provides the power to the Registrar to cancel registered documents, if it is found to be in contravention of sections 22A and 22B.

3. Whereas, this Court in S.M. Hajabakrutheen Vs. The Inspector General of Registration [W.P.(MD) Nos. 14546 of 2022 batch, dated 27.03.2023], in view of the conflicting views taken by two different benches of this Court regarding the applicability of Section 77A, has referred various issues for consideration by a Larger Bench of this Court. The relevant portion of the reference order is extracted as follows-

“20. In view of the reasonings of the Full Bench and in view of the conflicting views of the two learned Single Judges the following issues are referred for due consideration by a Larger Bench of this Court.

i) whether the recitals in a document presented for registration, can be examined to determine that such document was fraudulently executed or registered;
ii) whether a document in which the recitals alone are 3/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.23306 of 2023 questioned can be considered only as voidable which would normally necessitate the filing of the suit to set aside the particular document or whether even those documents can be cancelled by the Sub Registrar under Section 77A of the Registration Act;
iii) whether exercise of power under Section 77A must be restricted to registration of documents in contravention to Section 22-A or 22-B of Registration Act, 1908 alone?
iv) whether the exercise of such power under Section 77A of the Registration Act can be prospective in nature or retrospective in nature?

21. To determine these issues, the Registry may place all the writ petitions before the Hon'ble Administrative Judge for constitution of a Larger Bench to examine the issues in detail.

22. Till a decision is rendered by the Larger Bench, let no further action be taken by any of the Sub Registrars, who may await further orders of the Larger Bench.”

4. By referring to the above order, this Court in A.Shanthi v. The District Registrar [WP.No.18814 of 2023, dated 27.06.2023] has reiterated that the District Registrars across Tamil Nadu shall not take any action on an 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.23306 of 2023 application under Section 77A of the Registration Act, till the reference is answered by the Larger Bench. The relevant portion is extracted as follows:-

“4.In the light of the above order, there is no scope for considering the representation made by the petitioner at present and the petitioner has to necessarily await for the final orders to be passed by the Larger Bench on the issue. Hence, this writ petition is closed for the present.

5.It is brought to the notice of this Court that in spite of the above order passed by this Court, the District Registrars are entertaining the applications under Section 77A of the Registration Act and even orders are passed. It is not known as to whether this order was circulated to all the District Registrars in State of Tamil Nadu. In view of the above order, this Court once again reiterates that the District Registrars across Tamil Nadu shall not take any further action on the application submitted under Section 77A of the Registration Act, till a final decision is rendered by the Larger Bench. The Inspector General of Registration is directed to issue a Circular in this regard to all the District Registrars across the State of Tamil Nadu immediately” 5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.23306 of 2023

5.In view of the above decisions, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent civil Court and if any civil suit is filed, the same shall be entertained by the civil Court by excluding the period for which this writ petition was pending before this Court for the purpose of calculating the limitation period. The writ petitioner is also at liberty to invoke Section 77A of the Act upon the outcome of the reference made. No costs.




                                                                                        25.09.2023
                Index             : Yes / No
                Internet          : Yes / No
                NCC               : Yes / No
                ogy

                To

                The District Registrar,
                Tiruchirappalli District,
                Trichy.




                6/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                          W.P.(MD)No.23306 of 2023


                                       B.PUGALENDHI, J.

                                                             ogy




                                  W.P.(MD)No.23306 of 2023




                                                    25.09.2023




                7/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis