Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Patna High Court

Daya Shanker Prasad,Advocate vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 27 February, 2012

Author: Anjana Prakash

Bench: Anjana Prakash

Patna High Court CWJC No.3687 of 1996 dt.27-02-2012




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                       Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3687 of 1996
    ===========================================================
    Daya Shanker Prasad, Advocate son of Late Ram Chandra Prasad, resident of 18,
    Emerson Road, Danapur Cantt, P.S. Danapur, District Patna, present address, 65,
    Bihar Bar Council Bhawan, High Court, Patna
                                                                 .... .... Petitioner/s
                                          Versus
    1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
    2. The Commandant (Brigadier) Bihar and Orissa Sub Area, Danapur Cantt, P.S.
        Danapur, Dist. Patna
    3. The Executive Officer, Cantonement Board, Danapur Cantt, P.S. Danapur, Dist.
        Patna
    4. The District Magistrate, Patna
    5. The Senior S.P., Patna
    6. S.D.O. (Civil), Danapur Cantt., Patna
    7. Secretary Town Claub, Danapur Cantt., P.S. Danapur, Dist. Patna
    8. The Officer-in-charge, Danapur P.S.
                                                                .... .... Respondent/s
    ===========================================================
    Appearance :
    For the Petitioner/s :     None
    For the Respondent/s :     None
    ===========================================================
    CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH
    ORAL JUDGMENT
    Date: 27-02-2012

                           No one appears on behalf of the petitioner and the

                 State.

                           The petitioner happens to be the father of one

                 Prabhanjan Kumar, who was injured just before the visit of

                 Governor for inauguration of a Football match.

                           The petitioner prays for adequate compensation

                 for the same.

                           Having gone through the contents of the writ

                 application, in my opinion, the same is completely

                 misguided and based on disputed questions of facts, which
        Patna High Court CWJC No.3687 of 1996 dt.27-02-2012




                        cannot be appreciated by a writ Court.

                                  In view of such, the application is dismissed.




Patna High Court                                         ( Anjana Prakash, J. )
   Dated, 27th
 February, 2012

Narendra/ NAFR