Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Nirmal Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 13 August, 2015

Bench: T.S. Thakur, A.K. Sikri

                                                      1

     ITEM NO.Chamber                                                SECTION IIB

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

         R.P.(Crl.) No. 407/2015 In SLP(Crl) No. 4367/2014

     NIRMAL KUMAR                                                       Petitioner(s)

                                                     VERSUS

     STATE OF HARYANA                                                   Respondent(s)

     (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing review petition and
     exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and office
     report)


     Date : 13/08/2015 This petition was circulated today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

                                        By Circulation



                              UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

The review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.




     (Shashi Sareen)                                                  (Veena Khera)
       AR-cum-PS                                                      Court Master

(Signed order is placed on the file) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Shashi Sareen Date: 2015.08.13 10:35:03 IST Reason: 2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.407 OF 2015 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.4367 OF 2014 Nirmal Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent ORDER There is a delay of 370 days in the filing of this review petition for which no cogent explanation is forthcoming.

We have all the same examined the grounds urged in support of the prayer for review. We find no error apparent on the face of the record to warrant recall of our order dated 26 th May, 2014. The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of delay as also on merits.

……….........................……………..….J. (T.S. THAKUR) ……….........................……………..….J. (A.K. SIKRI) New Delhi August 13, 2015