Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Dr. Jayanta Sarkar vs Rubber Board on 9 June, 2025

                                                2025:KER:41981
WP(C) NO. 19087 OF 2017
                                 1


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON

  MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 / 19TH JYAISHTA, 1947

                      WP(C) NO. 19087 OF 2017

PETITIONERS:

     1      DR. JAYANTA SARKAR
            AGED 38 YEARS
            SCIENTIST B (CROP PHYSIOLOGY)RUBBER RESEARCH
            INSTITUTE OF INDIA,KOTTAYAM-686 009.

     2      THOMAS K.U.
            SCIENTIST B (MOLECULAR BIOLOGY)RUBBER RESEARCH
            INSTITUTE OF INDIA,KOTTAYAM-686 009.

     3      DR.MANOJ KURIAN
            SCIENTIST B (RUBBER TECHNOLOGY)RUBBER RESEARCH
            INSTITUTE OF INDIA,KOTTAYAM-686 009.

     4      DR.K.V.SUMESH
            SCIENTIST B (CROP PHYSIOLOGY)RUBBER RESEARCH
            INSTITUTE OF INDIA,KOTTAYAM-686 009.

     5      DR.SOBHA S.
            SCIENTIST B (BIOTECHNOLOGY)RUBBER RESEARCH
            INSTITUTE OF INDIA,KOTTAYAM-686 009.

     6      AMBILI K.K.
            SCIENTIST B (AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTRY)RUBBER
            RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INDIA,KOTTAYAM-686 009.

     7      DR.DEEPTHY ANTONY P.
            SCIENTIST B (BOTANY/PLANT BREEDING)HEVEA
            BREEDING SUB STATION,RUBBER RESEARCH INSTITUTE
            OF INDIA,KADABA, KARNATAKA-574 221.

     8      BHASKAR DATTA
            SCIENTIST B (AGRONOMY), REGIONAL RESEARCH
            STATION,RUBBER RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF
                                               2025:KER:41981
WP(C) NO. 19087 OF 2017
                              2


            INDIA,AGARTHALA-799 001.

     9      DR.DEBABRATA RAY
            SCIENTIST B (CROP PHYSIOLOGY),REGIONAL RESEARCH
            STATION,RUBBER RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF
            INDIA,AGARTHALA-799 001.

     0      RAVICHANDRAN S.
            SCIENTIST B (AGRONOMY), REGIONAL RESEARCH
            STATION,RUBBER RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF
            INDIA,DAPCHARI, MAHARASHTRA-401 610

    11      DR.SURYAKUMAR M.
            SCIENTIST B (BOTONY/PLANT BREEDING), HEVEA
            BREEDING SUB STATION,RUBBER RESEARCH STATION,
            PARLIAR, KANYAKUMARI,TAMIL NADU-670 703.


            BY ADVS.
            SHRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN
            SRI.K.JANARDHANA SHENOY
            SHRI.V.N.RAJAPPAN


RESPONDENTS:

     1      RUBBER BOARD
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,KOTTAYAM-686 002.

     2      CHAIRMANEXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
            RUBBER BOARD, KOTTAYAM-686 002.

     3      DIRECTOR RESEARCH
            RUBBER RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INDIA,KOTTAYAM-686
            009.

     4      UNION OF INDIA
            REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,MINISTRY OF
            COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY,GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,
            UDYOGA BHAVAN,NEW DELHI-110 017.

     5      THE SECRETARY
            MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES &
            PENSION,DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL &
            TRAINING,GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK,NEW
            DELHI-110 017.
                                                     2025:KER:41981
WP(C) NO. 19087 OF 2017
                                  3




             BY ADVS.
             SHRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA
             SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS
             SHRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS
             SRI.HARAN THOMAS GEORGE
             SRI.ISAAC THOMAS
             SMT.RACHEL ABRAHAM
             SHRI.C.DINESH, CGC



      THIS    WRIT    PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING    COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION     ON   09.06.2025,   THE   COURT   ON   THE     SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                  2025:KER:41981
WP(C) NO. 19087 OF 2017
                                4


                           JUDGMENT

The dispute in this writ petition is essentially with reference to the implementation of the Flexible Complementing Scheme (FCS) for the scientists working in the respondent Rubber Board on the basis of the 6th central pay commission.

2. I have heard Sri.Rakhukumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.C.Dinesh, the learned senior panel counsel for the respondents 4 and 5, as well as Sri.Isaac Thomas, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 to 3.

3. This Court notices that the submission made by the petitioners is essentially to the effect that, going by the benefits available under Ext.P1, insofar as the petitioners have admittedly put in three years' service, they were entitled for the benefit of the FCS and though Exts. P5 and P6 were submitted in tune with the directions contained therein, the petitioners are not being extended benefits under the scheme.

4. This Court, however, notices the submission made by Sri.Isaac Thomas on behalf of the Rubber Board that, even going by the scheme at Ext.P1, the benefits have to be extended after carrying out necessary amendments to the 2025:KER:41981 WP(C) NO. 19087 OF 2017 5 Recruitment Rules of the Rubber Board, for which appropriate action has been taken by the Board, and it is only on account of the non-approval of the amendments proposed, at the hands of the Union, that the Rubber Board is not in a position to implement the directions as per Ext.P1. This Court also takes note of Ext.R1(g), as per which the petitioners have already been extended certain other MACP benefits, on account of which the benefits that are available under Ext.P1 are more or less extended to the petitioners. At the same time, this Court notices that if the benefits of the FCS scheme were extended, the petitioners would have received the said benefit much earlier than the benefits now granted as per the MACP Scheme.

5. In such circumstances, this Court holds that it is for the Union of India to take into consideration the stand taken by the Rubber Board that they have already taken steps for amending the Recruitment Rules by making appropriate representations to the union and it is for the centre to accept the afore recommendations at the earliest.

6. Therefore, this writ petition would stand disposed of, directing the 4th respondent to take note of the 2025:KER:41981 WP(C) NO. 19087 OF 2017 6 recommendations made by the Rubber Board for amending the Recruitment Rules and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment.

The Rubber Board to extend whatever benefits that are available to the petitioners on the basis of the orders to be issued by the 4th respondent herein, as above, while implementing the benefits extended through Ext.P1 thereafter. Needless to say that the Rubber Board would be entitled to evaluate the entitlement of the individual petitioners in tune with Ext.P1, as seen from Exts.P5 and P6 submitted by the petitioners, while considering the eligibility of the respective petitioners.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE GBG 2025:KER:41981 WP(C) NO. 19087 OF 2017 7 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19087/2017 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 A Photostat copy of the order No. K-

39011/5/2024 - PLANT B dated 10-10-2024 issued by the 4th respondent, received by this counsel from the petitioners RESPONDENT EXHIBITS Exhibit R1(h) True copy of the Office Memorandum No. 3/2(1)/2021/CPS dated 16.08.2021 issued by the Rubber Board granting MACP benefits to the Petitioners Exhibit R1(i) True copy of the Office Memorandum No. 3/2(1)/2024/CPS dated 02.01.2024 issued by the Rubber Board granting MACP benefits to the Petitioners Exhibit R1(g) True copy of the communication dated 24.10.2024 issued by the Executive Director, Rubber Board to the Director (Plantations), the Department of Commerce, Ministry of Commerce and Industry PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P5 : A TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE NOTE DATED 15- 09-2015 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DIRECTING THE PETITIONERS TO PROVIDE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT.

EXHIBIT P1 :              A TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE MEMORANDUM
                          DATED   10-09-2010    ISSUED  BY  THE   5TH
                          RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7 :              A   TRUE   COPY   OF    THE  REPRESENTATION

SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 30-08-2016. EXHIBIT P6 : A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTE DATED 21-09-2015 OF THE DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH OF RUBBER RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INDIA.

EXHIBIT P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE ORDER NO.985 DATED 2-4-2014 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 :              A TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE MEMORANDUM
                          DATED   17-7-2002    ISSUED  BY   THE   5TH
                          RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4 :              A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.G4/2341/TC/A

TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATED 21-9-2012 OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT.