Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

R.Jaikrishnan Nair vs Board Of Directors Of The Alleppey on 17 September, 2012

Author: K.Vinod Chandran

Bench: K.Vinod Chandran

       

  

  

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                                PRESENT:-

                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

             THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013/4TH ASWINA, 1935

                                 W.P.(C).No.19973 of 2013 (V)
                                 -----------------------------------------------

PETITIONER:-
--------------------

           R.JAIKRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 46 YEARS,
           S/O. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR(LATE),
           KRISHNA SREE, CHANDRAMANGALAM, EAST ARPOOKKARA,
           KOTTAYAM.

                    BY ADVS.SRI.P.V.BABY
                         SRI.A.N.SANTHOSH.


RESPONDENTS:-
-------------------------

        1. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ALLEPPEY
                   CO-OPERATIVE SPINNING MILLS LTD.,
           KAREELAKULANGARA P.O., KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA - 690 572,
           REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

        2. HANDLOOMS AND TEXTILES DIRECTOR,
           OFFICE OF THE HANDLOOM AND TEXTILES DIRECTORATE,
           VIKAS BHAVAN,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

        3. ALLEPPEPY CO-OPERATIVE SPINNING MILLS EMPLOYEES UNION (CITU),
           KAREELAKULANGARA P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 690 572,
           REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, T.R.VIJAYAKUMAR.

        4. ALLEPPEY CO-OPERATIVE SPINNING MILLS EMPLOYEES CONGRESS (INTUC),
           KAREELAKULANGARA P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 690 572,
           REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, R.BIJU.

        5. J.AMBADI,
           MACHINE OPERATOR
           ALLEPPEY CO-OPERATIVE SPINNING MILLS LTD.,
           KAREELANKULANGARA P.O., KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA - 690 572.

W.P.(C).NO.19973 OF 2013
                                     - 2 -


     6. R.BIJU,
        CLEANING OPERATOR,
        ALLEPPEY CO-OPERATIVE SPINNING MILLS LTD.
        KAREELAKULANGARA P.O., KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA - 690 572.

     7. STATE OF KERALA,
        REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TOINDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT,
        SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

      R1 BY STANDING COUNSEL SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN.
      R3, R4, R5 & R6 BY ADV. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN.
      R7 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL.


        THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-09-2013,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-

W.P.(C).No. 19973 of 2013 (V)
-----------------------------------------

                                            APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-
-------------------------------------

EXT.P1 :           COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.18786/2012 DTD.29.11.2012.

EXT.P2 :           COPY OF THE WRITTEN COMPLAINT OF THE LADY SUPERVISOR
                   SUBMITTED TO THE GENERAL MANAGER OF THE MILL DTD.10.5.2013.

EXT.P3 :           COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DTD.13.5.2013 ISSUED TO THE
                   6TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4 :           COPY OF THE ORDER OF SUSPENSION DTD.15.5.2013 ISSUED
                   TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P5 :           COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.20.5.2013 ISSUED
                   BY THE GENERAL MANAGER.

EXT.P6 :           COPY OF THE ORDER WITHDRAWING THE SUSPENSION DTD.23.5.2013
                   ISSUED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P7 :           COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM PUBLISHED IN THE MATHRUBHUMI DAILY
                   DTD.13.5.2013.

EXT.P8 :           COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM PUBLISHED IN THE MALAYALA MANORAMA
                   DAILY DTD.29.5.2013.

EXT.P9 :           COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.3.7.2013 ISSUED TO THE
                   ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARYOF THE STATE.

EXT.P10:           COPY OF THE PETITION LODGED BY THE LADIES SUPERVISOR TO THE
                   WOMEN'S COMMISSION TRIVANDRUM DTD.4.7.2013 ALONG WITH
                   ITS ACCEPTANCE RECEIPT DTD.8.7.2013.

EXT.P11:           COPY OF THE LEAVE SANCTIONING ORDER AND DIRECTION ISSUED
                   TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT DTD.3.8.2013.

EXT.P12:           COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.8.8.2013 SUBMITTED BY THE
                   PETITIONER TO THE 7TH RESPONDENT.

W.P.(C).No. 19973 of 2013 (V)
                                               - 2 -

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:-
----------------------------------------

EXT.R3(a) -        TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.09.2012 OF THE STATE
                   HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION.

EXT.R3(b) -        TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.09.2012 IN HRMP.NO.2837/2012
                   OF THE STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION.

EXT.R3(c)          TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 17.4.2012 PREFERRED BY
                   NAIB SUBEDAR SHAJI KUMAR.

EXT.R3(d)          TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 1.12.2012 PREFERRED BY
                   MRS.SMITHA RAJ.

EXT.R3(e)          TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY 184 WORKERS OF THE
                   SPINNING MILL BEFORE THE CHIEF MINISTER.

EXT.R3(f)          TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.3.2011 IN W.P.(C).
                   NO.1359 OF 2009 OF THIS COURT.

EXT.R3(g)          TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 3.11.1997 ISSUED
                   BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR TO THE PETITIONER.

EXT.R3(h)          TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.11.1997 OF THE MANAGING
                   DIRECTOR.

                                          ( TRUE COPY )



                       K. Vinod Chandran, J.
                   --------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C).No.19973 of 2013-V
                   --------------------------------------
           Dated this the 26th day of September, 2013

                              JUDGMENT

The petitioner was granted leave between 01.08.2013 and 30.09.2013 and a decision was also taken to conduct a detailed enquiry by the Director of Handlooms and Textiles, who is the 2nd respondent herein. The only prayer in the writ petition was that the enquiry shall not be entrusted with the 2nd respondent or to any subordinate officer of the 2nd respondent.

2. Whether the said claim is sustainable or not does not survive for consideration, since it is submitted by both sides that the Joint Secretary for Industries Department has been entrusted with the enquiry. In the circumstances, the writ petition is closed, leaving open the rights available to either of the parties.

Sd/-

K.Vinod Chandran Judge.

vku/-

( true copy )