Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Puran Chand vs Haryana Power Generation Corporation ... on 19 March, 2012

Author: K. Kannan

Bench: K. Kannan

C.W.P. No.18308 of 2011                                    -1-

     IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                            CHANDIGARH
                                C.W.P. No.18308 of 2011
                                Date of Decision.19.03.2012

Puran Chand                                          .....Petitioner
                                   Versus

Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited and others
                                                   .....Respondents
2.   C.W.P. No.18330 of 2011

Hem Lata                                                   .....Petitioner
                                   Versus

State of Haryana and another                               .....Respondents

3.      C.W.P. No.18616 of 2011

Mangat Ram                                                 .....Petitioner
                                   Versus

State of Haryana and another                               .....Respondents

4.      C.W.P. No.20138 of 2011

Jassa Ram                                                  .....Petitioner
                                   Versus

State of Haryana and another                         .....Respondents

5.      C.W.P. No.18321 of 2011

Pritam Singh                                               .....Petitioner
                                   Versus

State of Haryana and another                               .....Respondents

Present:      Mr. Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Advocate
              for the petitioner.

              Mr. Pradeep Virk, DAG, Haryana.

              Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate for
              Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate
              for respondent No.2.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the
   judgment ? No
2.     To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No
 C.W.P. No.18308 of 2011                                -2-

3.   Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No
                                      -.-
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)

1. All the writ petitions are connected and are being disposed of together. The principal contest is entered by respondent No.2. The issue raised in this case is the entitlement of persons, who are seniors, to stepping up of the scales at par with the juniors, who are promoted in the reserved category. Post 85th amendment, the only benefit a junior can get is an accelerated promotion without letting a senior catch up with him on his seniority. Otherwise as regards scales, the seniors would still be entitled to a stepping up of the scale at par with the scale given to the junior at the time when the promotion is offered. This matter has been considered by this Court in Kiran Bala and another Vs. State of Haryana and another in C.W.P. No.8318 of 2010 dated 28.04.2011, which has been affirmed by a Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.1749 of 2011 dated 26.09.2011.

2. The recovery ordered after having given the benefit of stepping up is quashed. The impugned order refusing the scale shall also stand quashed and they are entitled to stepping up of the scale at par with the juniors, who had been promoted against the reserved category.

3. The writ petition is allowed on the above extent. If there has been any recoveries pursuant to the impugned order, the same shall be refunded within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 19, 2012 Pankaj*